摘要
在剥削行为界定问题上 ,目前理论界有明显分歧。以是否无偿占有他人劳动、以行为是否合法及以生产要素是否得到最优配置是其中的几个不同标准。运用历史唯物主义观点和方法 ,应从“三个有利于”角度客观、历史地分析剥削行为的实践作用。一方面 ,剥削是社会财富积累、资本积累的动力 ;另一方面 ,剥削对生产力的进步和发展又具有障碍。
At present there are conspicuous divergence on the definition of practice of exploitation among academic circles. Several standards are adopted to define it such as whether the possess products of others' labor are possessed or not, whether behaviors are legal or not, or whether factors of production are disposed best or not. In my opinion, exploitation should be analysized from the perspective of historical materialism. Furthermore, the roles of practice of exploitation should be objectively and historically treated on the basis of 'the three benefits'. On one hand, exploitation is the impetus of accumulating wealth and capital for society; on the other hand, it does harm to the process and development of productive force.
出处
《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第4期7-12,共6页
Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
