摘要
目的 评价晚期非小细胞肺癌采用EAP和CAP方案介入治疗的效果。方法 分别采用EAP和CAP方案介入治疗非小细胞肺癌 10 8例和 98例。结果 有效率EAP组为 5 1.9% ,CAP组为 5 3.1% ,两组无显著性差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。CAP组的胃肠道毒性比EAP组严重 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,EAP组的骨髓抑制较CAP组严重 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 采用EAP和CAP方案介入治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌是最佳的治疗方法 ,对EAP和CAP化疗方案的采用必须全面考虑 ,权衡利弊 ,正确选择。
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of EAP regimen and CAP regimen for interventional treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Methods 108 cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer were interventionally treated with EAP regimen and 98 cases with CAP regimen.Results Response rates were 51.9% and 53.1%,respectively.There was no statistical difference between them(P>0.05).Gastrointestinal tract toxic reaction in CAP regimen group was more serious than that in EAP regimen group (P<0.05).However,the bone marrow suppression was more serious in EAP group than that in CAP group (P<0.05).Conclusion Both EAP regimen and CAP regimen are very effective for interventional treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.It has to take a thorough consideration before the adoption of the chemotherapy of EAP and CAP.
出处
《中国肿瘤临床与康复》
2001年第4期57-59,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词
介入放射学
化疗
肺癌
治疗
lung tumor
interventional radiology
chemotherapy
