期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死合并新发生完全性右束支传导阻滞的临床意义 被引量:9

Clinical significance of new complete right bundle branch block of acute myocardial infarction was recently happend
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的了解伴随急性心肌梗死出现的完全性右束支传导阻滞的临床特点和预后意义。方法观察有新出现持续性完全性右束支传导阻滞的急性心肌梗死患者45例 (观察组 ) ,同期收治的无右束支传导阻滞的急性心肌梗死患者90例 (对照组 )的CK峰值、KilliP分级、严重心律失常发生率、LVEF和住院病死率的情况。结果观察组CK峰值 (2498±1369U/L) ,明显高于对照组 (1757±1026U/L) (P<0.05)。观察组Killip平均级别2.5±1.1 ,非常明显高于对照组 (1.7±0.9) ,(P<0.01)。观察组缓慢型心律失常及室性恶性心律失常发生率 (20%、16 % ) ,明显高于对照组 (4 %、4% ) (P均<0.05)。观察组的住院病死率 (15.6 % )显著高于对照组 (4.4% ) (P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死新出现的持续性完全性右束支传导阻滞提示临床病情危险 ,预后不良。 Objective To investigate clinical significance and prognosis of complete right bundle branch block(CRBBB) in patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction(AMI). Methods 45 patients with new persistent CRBBB complicated following AMI(n=45) admitted into our hospital were included(observation group,n=45),90 patients admitted in same period with AMI but without RBBB were used as control group(n=90).Admitted peak value of serum CK,degree of Killip,incidence of severe arrhythmias,LVEF and in_hospital mortality of all patients were analyzed. Results Peak value of serum CK in observation group(2498±1369 U/L) was significantly higher than that in control group(1757±1026 U/L)(P<0.05).Cardiac function was more severely damaged in observation group,average degrees of Killip were 2.5±1.1,significantly higher than that in control group(1.7±0.9)(P<0.01). Compared with control group, observation group showed increased incidence of bradyarrhythmia(20% vs.4%,P<0.05),severe ventricular arrhythmia(16% vs.4%,P<0.05) and increased in_hospital mortality(15.6% vs.4.4%,P<0.05).Conclusion New persistent CRBBB following AMI indicated severe clinical situation and poor prognosis.
出处 《心电学杂志》 2001年第2期67-69,共3页 Journal of Electrocardiology(China)
关键词 急性心肌梗死 右束支传导阻滞 病死率 CK峰值 Myocardial infarction Acute Right bundle branch block CK Killip Mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Melgar MA, Galcera TJ, Garcia AA, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of right bundle branch biock in acude myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1997,96(4):1139.
  • 2Nimetz AA, Shubrook SJ, Hutter AM, et al. The significence of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarction , Am Heart J, 1975,90(4): 439.
  • 3Hindman MC,Wagner GS,Jaro M,et al.The clinical significence of bundle branch block complication acute myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1978,58(4): 67.
  • 4Klein RC, Vera Z, Mason DT, et al. Intraventricular conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction: Incedence, prognosis, and thrapy,Am Heart J, 1984, 108(4): 1007.
  • 5Hauer RNW, Lie KI, Liem KL, et al. Long-term prognosis in patients with bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction,Am J Cardiol, 1982,49(7): 1581.
  • 6张家利,吴一远,尹娟,高秉新.右束支阻滞在急性心肌梗死中的意义[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2000,4(3):178-180. 被引量:25
  • 7Ricou F, Nicod P, Gilpin FE, et al. Influence of right bundle branch block on short-and long-term survival after acute anterior myocardial infarction.JACC, 1991,17(4): 858.

二级参考文献1

共引文献24

同被引文献38

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部