摘要
自狄尔泰提出“自然需要说明 ,历史需要理解”之后 ,关于说明与理解及其相互关系的争论一直延续至今。本文提出 :“自然现象的说明需要理解 ,人文社会现象的理解也需要说明”。并就说明与理解在自然科学和人文社会科学中的方法论地位、作用 ,二者的统一及其机制等问题作了初步探讨。
Since Dilthy Proposed that “whereas nature is subject to explanation, history is amenable to understanding”, there have been the debates about the understanding and explanation and the relation between them. In this paper, the author argues that, “The explanation of nature phenomenon is in need of understanding, and the understanding of human social phenomenon is in need of explanation”. Moreover, the author probes preliminarily such problems as the importance and the function that the understanding and the explanation have methodologically in the natural science, humanities and social sciences, the unification and its mechanism of understanding and explanation, and the like.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第4期29-33,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
