摘要
目的:通过对86例不同方式腹股沟疝修补术患者的近、远期随访,比较传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术对腹股沟疝治疗的临床疗效。方法:收集临床及随访资料完整并行疝修补术者86例,其中行传统疝修补术者47例(对照组),无张力疝修补术39例(治疗组),对两组患者的临床治疗效果进行比较分析。结果:治疗组较对照组近、远期临床疗效更优,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无张力修补术是治疗腹股沟疝较好的手术方式,该术式操作简单,且近、远期疗效较好适于在基层推广。
Objective：To compare the traditional hernioplasty and plug mesh hernia repair in the clinical treatment effect of inguinal hernia through a short and long-term follow-up of 86 patients with inguinal hernia. Methods：86 cases of inguinal hernia patients with complete clinic and follow-up data were divided into traditional hernia repair in 47 cases （control group） and tension free hernia repair in 39 cases （treatment group）, and compared the two group clinical effects. Results：The treatment group was superior clinical efficacy compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant （ P＆lt;0.05）. Conclusion：Tension free herniorrhaphy for treatment of inguinal hernia operation was better, the operation was simple, effective, and suitable for promotion in the primary hospital.
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2014年第3期61-62,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词
腹股沟疝
手术
随访
Inguinal hernia
Operation
Follow-up
