期刊文献+

腹股沟疝复发相关性分析 被引量:15

Relative analysis between postoperative complications and recurrent inguinal hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨引起腹股沟疝复发的因素。方法对重庆医科大学附属第一医院1996年1月至2011年12月收治的腹股沟疝患者,采用Logistic回归方程分析其疝的类型(斜疝、直疝、股疝),年龄(≥50岁、<50岁),性别、手术方式(传统疝修补术与无张力疝修补术),术前合并症以及手术后的并发症与手术后复发的危险关系。结果共施行腹股沟疝修补术1582例次,其中初发疝占91.5%,复发疝占8.5%。与传统的疝修补术相比,无张力疝修补术对复发疝再手术的相对危险度低,男性、直疝、复发疝和术前合并症未控制是手术后复发的重要危险因素。结论术后并发症与术后复发无明显相关关系,积极控制术前合并症及采用无张力疝修补术可降低复发性腹股沟疝的再发。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the risk factors of recurrent groin hernia. Methods Data were collected from all hernia repairs in The First Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University during January 1996 to December 2011. The type of hernias ( indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia, and femoral hernia) ,age (≥50 years, 〈 50 years), gender, type of operations (traditional repair and tension-free hernia) ,preoperative complications, postoperative complications and the relationship of postoperative recur- rence were analyzed by a logistic regression model. Results A total of 1 582 patients were operated with hernia repair including 91.5% of primary hernia and 8.5% of recurrent hernia. Compared to the traditional hernia,the relative risk of tension-free repair was low. Male, direct hernia, recurrent hernia and preoperative complications were the risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Conclusions Postoperative complications were not linked to an increased relative risk for recurrence. The application of tension-free hernia repair and control of preoperative complications may decrease recurrence of recurrent hernia.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2013年第1期26-29,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 腹股沟 复发 危险因素 手术后并发症 Hernia, inguinal Recurrence Risk factors Postoperative complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Nienhuijs S,Staal E,Strobbe L,et al. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg,2007,194 ( 3 ) : 394-400.
  • 2Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg,2004,240(4) :578-585.
  • 3Luijendijk RW,Hop WC,van den Tol MP,et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med, 2000,343(6) :392-398.
  • 4Anonymous. The Danish hernia database-the first year. Ugeskr Laeger,2000,162 ( 11 ) : 1552-1555.
  • 5Ott V, Groebli Y, Schneider R. Late intestinal fistula formation after incisional hernia using intraperitoneal mesh. Hernia, 2005,9 ( 1 ) : 103-104.
  • 6Benedetti M, Albertario S, Niebel T, et al. Intestinal perforation as a long-term complication of plug and mesh inguinal hernioplasty: case report. Hernia,2005,9( 1 ) :93-95.
  • 7Nowak DD,Chin AC,Singer MA, et al. Large scrotal hernia:a complicated case of mesh migration, ascites, and bowel strangulation. Hernia,2005,9( 1 ) :96-99.
  • 8van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, et al. Long-term follow- up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal henia. Br J Surg,2007,94 (4) :506 -510.
  • 9Grant AM, EU Henia Trialists Collaboration. Open mesh versus non- mesh repair of groin henia: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Henia,2002,6(3 ) : 130-136.
  • 10Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Christensen IJ, et al. Risk of recurrence 5 years or more after primary Liehtenstein mesh and sutured inguinal henia repair. Br J Surg,2007,94(8 ) :1038-1040.

同被引文献142

引证文献15

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部