摘要
目的研究医院不同科室清洗腹腔镜手术器械的效果差异,为加强硬式内镜器械管理提供依据。方法采用Pro-tect M检测和隐血试验方法,对某医院手术室和消毒供应中心清洗的腹腔镜手术器械的效果进行评价。结果手术室手工清洗组清洗后的腹腔镜手术器械经Pro-tect M检测清洗质量合格率为49.58%,隐血试验检测合格率为66.67%。消毒供应中心机洗组清洗的腹腔镜手术器械经Pro-tect M检测清洗质量合格率为98.33%,隐血试验检测合格率为100%。结论消毒供应中心负责清洗的腹腔镜手术器械质量明显优于手术室手工清洗组,两种检测方法的检测结果存在差异。
Objective To compare the cleaning effects of laparoscope cleaning effect so as to provide the evidence for im- proving the rigid endoscope management. Methods Pro - tect M detection and occult blood test were used to evaluate the cleaning effect of the laparoseope instrument in operating room and central sterile supply department （CSSD）. Results The cleaning qualified rate of Pro - teet M detection of laparoscope instruments sterilized by hand - wash in operating room was 49. 58% , and occult blood test result was 66, 67%. However, the instruments sterilized by machine wash in CSSD, the cleaning qualified rate of Pro - tect M detection was 98. 33% and the occult blood test result was 100%, Conclusion The cleaning effect of the laparoseope instruments in CSSD are obviously better than that cleaned by hand - wash in operat- ing room. There are differences in the results of two detection methods.
出处
《中国消毒学杂志》
CAS
北大核心
2014年第6期589-591,594,共4页
Chinese Journal of Disinfection
基金
福建省妇幼保健院院内基金项目
关键词
腹腔镜
手术室
消毒供应中心
清洗质量
比较
laparoscope
operating room
central sterile supply department
cleaning quality
comparison
