摘要
最高人民法院、最高人民检察院和公安部2011年发布了《关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》,确立了相关案件的证据规则。但有些规定缺乏理论根据,在司法实践中也难以实施,需要深入探讨。对于行政机关取证的效力问题,应当在法律中设立证据规则进行规范,所有行政机关取证都不应再要求"转化"。对于抽样取证问题,则应规范其适用条件、证据能力,在判断抽样取证的证明力时,要考虑抽样误差。该"意见"设定的推定条款应在刑法中设定,且该推定条款自身有不合理之处。
The Notice of the Supreme People＇s Court, the Supreme People＇s Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security on Issuing the Opinions on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in Handling Intellectual Property Right Infringement Criminal Cases has set up the rules of evidence for some criminal cases. For lacking theoretical basis, however, some regulations are hard to be applied in judicial practice and need further analysis. Some evidence rules should be established to resolve the problem of the legal validity of evidence which collected by administrative organization and such evidence should be no more transformed. The sampling for evidence collection should be normalized in application condition and competence of evidence. When deciding the competence of evidence, we should also consider the sampling errors. Although the presumption provisions in the above ＂opinion＂ are unreasonable, they were should have be setted in the Criminal Law.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期35-39,共5页
Intellectual Property
关键词
行政机关取证
抽样取证
推定
evidence collected by administrative organization
sampling for evidence collectio
presumption
