摘要
目的：比较子宫肌瘤剔除术与子宫动脉栓塞治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效。方法将158例经病理证实确诊的子宫肌瘤患者采用数字表法随机分为子宫动脉栓塞治疗组和子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗组，各79例。比较两组患者术后3d出血量、盆腔疼痛和压迫症状，记录住院时间、正常活动时间及随访情况。结果两组盆腔疼痛、压迫症状、住院时间、痊愈率、并发症发生率和半年复发率差异均无统计学意义（ t＝1．21、0．97、1．06，χ^2＝0．98、1．21、1．32，均P＞0．05）。子宫动脉栓塞治疗组术后出血量评分、恢复正常活动时间分别为（5．8±0．5）分、（9．8±1．8）d，均优于子宫肌瘤剔除治疗组的（4．9±0．4）分、（25．9±5．1）d（t＝3．76、5．98，均P＜0.05）。结论子宫肌瘤剔除术和动脉栓塞术的治疗效果相差不大，都具有较高的有效率和安全性；但动脉栓塞手术对患者机体影响更小。
Objective To compare the effect of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids .Methods 158 patients who were pathologically diagnosed uterine fibroids were randomly divided into the uterine artery embolization group and myomectomy group ,79 cases in each group .The blood loss 3 days after operation,pelvic pain and pressure symptoms ,hospitalization time,follow-up and time of normal activity were recorded and compared.Results The pelvic pain,pressure symptoms,hospitalization time,cure rate,incidence rate of compli-cations and recurrence rate of the two groups had no statistically significant differences （ t=1.21,0.97,1.06,χ2 =0.98,1.21,1.32,all P＆gt;0.05）.The postoperative bleeding score ,time of return to normal activity in the uterine artery embolization group were （5.8 ±0.5） points,（9.8 ±1.8） d,which were better than those of the myomectomy group[（4.9 ±0.4）points,（25.9 ±5.1）d]（t=3.76,5.98,all P〈0.05）.Conclusion The effect of the myomec-tomy and uterine artery embolization treatment for uterine leiomyoma is similar ,and both have high efficiency and safe-ty,but the uterine artery embolization treatment has less impact on the body of patients .
出处
《中国基层医药》
CAS
2014年第10期1487-1488,共2页
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
