期刊文献+

基于熵权修正的风电机组可靠性模糊评价方法 被引量:3

Fuzzy Reliability Evaluation of Wind Turbines Modified by Entropy Weights
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 风电机组的可靠性水平是反映机组性能的重要指标之一,通常采用可利用率来评价机组的可靠性,但这种方法有时不能准确反映机组的可靠性水平,同时,在机组的可靠性评价中存在一些模糊性质。针对上述问题,提出一种基于模糊集理论的多指标风电机组可靠性评价方法。该方法基于模糊综合评价的原理,以机组平均故障间隔时间、平均维修时间、停机次数、功率曲线符合率和可利用率作为评价指标,对机组的可靠性进行评价。在权重设置的过程中,为消除专家的主观影响,根据信息熵原理,通过计算指标数据熵权,与专家权重综合成复合权重,再利用加权平均型算子,计算得到机组可靠性评价结果。根据北方某风电场10台风电机组的2012年度运行数据,运用所提方法,对这些机组的可靠性进行了评价。对比分析表明,该方法能够更准确地评价机组可靠性水平。 Wind turbine reliability is an important indicator reflecting performances of turhines, whic.h is currently evahmted by the availability of a turbine, hut it might not accurately reflect the level of the unit's reliability. Meanwhile, there are some vague natures in the process of the reliability evaluatiun. To solve these problems, by using multiple indicators of the wind turbine, a method based on fnzzy set theory was proposed to evaluation the unit's reliability. According to the principle of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the turbine's mean time hetweeo thilures, mean time to repair, fault numher, power curve consistent rate and availability were used as the evaluation index, and its reliability was finally evaluated. In the process of setting the weights, in order to eliminate the subjective effects of' experts, the entropy weight was calculated based on information entropy principle, and the entropy weight and expert weight were synthesized to get the composite weight. Then, by using the weighted average operator, the evaluation result of the reliability was caleulated. According to the operating data of 10 wind turbines in a wind farm of north China during 2012, the reliability of these units were evaluated using the method mentioned ahove. Through eomparison with the conventional method, the results show that this method is more accurate.
出处 《中国电力》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期136-140,共5页 Electric Power
关键词 风电机组 可靠性 模糊评价 熵权 wind turbine reliability fuzzy evaluation entropy weights
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1李俊蜂,蔡丰波,乔黎明,等.中国风电发展报告2013[R].北京:中国资源综合利用协会可再生能源专业委员会,2013.
  • 2RIBRANT J,BERTLJNG L.Survey of failures in wind powersytems with focus on Swedish wind power plants during 1997-2005[J].IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,2007.22(1):167-173.
  • 3王建东,汪宁渤,何世恩,刘光途,马彦宏,陟晶,丁坤,赵龙.国际风电预测预报机制初探及对中国的启示[J].电力建设,2010,31(9):10-13. 被引量:13
  • 4TAVNI P, XIAN; J, SPINATO . Ieliability analysis fiw wind turbines [J]. Wind lnergy, 2007, 10(1): 1-18.
  • 5SPINATO F, TAVNER P, VAN BUSSEL G. et td. Reliability of wind turbine subassemblies [J]. lET Renewable Power Generation, 2009, 3(4): 387-401.
  • 6FISCHER K, BFSNAIID F, BERTL1NG lltliabilily-ctmterd mainlmance tor wind turbines based on satislial analysis and practical experience [J]. Energy. Conversion, 2012. 27(1): 184-196.
  • 7PINAR PEREZ J M. MARQUEZ F P G. TOBIAS A. et al. Wind turbine reliability analysis IJl- Remwale and Suslainal)h+ Energy Reviews. 2013. 23(7): 463-472.
  • 8ZADEH I, A. Fuzzy sets [J]. Infimnatiml and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
  • 9靳涛,付忠广,满若岩,杨勇平.火电厂综合评估的模糊评价法[J].热能动力工程,2010,25(5):473-477. 被引量:18
  • 10满若岩,付忠广.基于模糊综合评判的火电厂状态评估[J].中国电机工程学报,2009,29(5):5-10. 被引量:46

二级参考文献78

共引文献194

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部