摘要
深圳市采用仲裁方式处理医患纠纷为化解医患矛盾、保证深圳市医疗机构正常运转起到了一定的作用,但仍存在一些问题:医患双方难以达成仲裁协议;不能聘请异地仲裁员;做医疗损害鉴定的案例结案时间长;仲裁庭人数限制不利于处理复杂医患纠纷;仲裁裁决后难以启动其他司法程序维护权利等。解决这些问题可考虑试行在重大诊疗风险病例治疗前签署仲裁协议;受理异地医患纠纷;与正在推行的医疗损害责任保险制度进行有效整合,通过纠纷的处理获取合理的报酬,才能保证这种方式能长久运转。同时,还需制定更适合仲裁模式的指南供双方选择,并改革现有仲裁庭的组成形式。
Arbitration method of dealing with doctor- patient dispute played a role to defuse doctor - patient conflicts, maintain the normal operation of medical institutions in Shenzhen, but some problems still existed： it＇s hard to reach the arbitration agreement, cant hire nonlocal arbi- trators, time of the cases which need medical damage appraisal last too long; it＇s not good to deal with the complex disputes with limited people in arbitration court; it＇s hard to start other judicial process to stand up for rights after arbitration, etc. Measures to solve the problems can be： to sigh arbitration agreement before the cure the case with big risk ; to deal with the nonlocal disputes ; to integrate medical damage liability insurance sys- tem effectively; through the dispute processing to obtain the reasonable compensation, to ensure that this approach can work for a long time. Set the guidelines for both sides to choose more suitable for arbitration dispute, and reform the existing form of the composition of the arbitration tribunal
出处
《医学与社会》
2014年第4期73-75,共3页
Medicine and Society
关键词
医疗机构
医患纠纷
仲裁
Medical Institution
Medical Dispute
Arbitration
