摘要
目的:对常用傣族药"傣百解"的基原植物进行分类学考证。方法:采用文献查证、形态解剖学、生药学、分子生物学、植物化学等方法进行对比分析。结果:经过深入的研究发现傣百解历史学名苦绳Dregea sinensis Hemsl.系误定,各项研究结果表明"傣百解"与苦绳从分布区、形态解剖学、生药学、分子生物学和化学成分上均存在较大差异,与《Flora of China》中记载的Marsdenia tenacissima(Roxb.)Moon特征相符。结论:"傣百解"原植物为萝藦科通光散M.tenacissima,《中国植物志》中收载的通光散的描述及插图有误,《Flora of China》中M.tenacissima的插图也有错误。
Objective： To identify the original plant of ＂ Daibaijie＂ , commonly used Dai herb. Method： The literature re- view, morphology and anatomy, pharmacognosy, molecular biology, chemistry were used to analysis. Result： Daibaijie＇s historical sci- entific name, Dregea sinensis Hems1. , was mistakenly given ＂Daibaijie＂ and D. sinensis have significant differences from the distribu- tion, morphology and anatomy, pharmacognosy, molecular biology and chemical composition. ＂Daibaijie＂ matches with the character- istics of Marsdenia tenacissima （Roxb.） Moon in Flora of China in English. Conclusion： Daibaijie＇s original plant is M. tenacissima （ Roxb. ） Moon. The description and illustration of M. tenacissima （ Roxb. Moon in Flora of China in China are wrong. The illustra- tion of M. tenacissima in Flora of China in English is wrong too.
出处
《中国中药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第8期1525-1529,共5页
China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
基金
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(YZYN-10-02)
西双版纳州三项经费专项(201107)
关键词
傣百解
通光散
苦绳
基原植物
考证
Daibaijie
Marsdenia tenacissima
Dregea sinensis
original plant
identification
