摘要
目的:比较强的松龙阻滞配合金黄膏外敷较电针配合金黄膏外敷治疗踝关节扭伤的疗效差异。方法:将64例踝关节扭伤患者按就诊先后顺序随机分为治疗组和对照组,各32例。治疗组采用强的松龙阻滞配合金黄膏外敷治疗,对照组采用电针配合金黄膏外敷治疗,两组在治疗2个疗程后进行疗效评定。结果:治疗组在疼痛、肿胀、功能活动度方面明显优于对照组,治疗组临床治愈率为90.6%,总有效率为100%;对照组临床治愈率为56.2%,总有效率为90.6%,(P<0.05)。结论:强的松龙阻滞配合金黄膏外敷治疗踝关节扭伤较电针配合金黄膏外敷治疗踝关节扭伤具有显著疗效优势。
Objective ： To make different effect observations between prednisolone with golden plaster and electro-acupuncture with golden plaster for ankle sprain. Methods： 64 patients with ankle sprain were divided into two 32-patient groups randomly： the treatment group and the contrast group. The treatment group was treated with prednisolone and golden plaster while the contrast group given electro-acupuncture and golden plaster. The effects of those two groups after two phases were compared. Results ： The clinical effective rate of the treatment group was 90.6%, and the total effective rate was 100%. The clinical effective rate of the contrast group was 56.2% and the total effective rate was 90.6%.Differences of two groups had statistical significance in pain, swelling and functional activity （ P〈0.05 ）. Conclusion ： The clinical effective of prednisolone with golden piaster therapy for ankle sprain is significant.
出处
《辽宁中医药大学学报》
CAS
2014年第4期188-190,共3页
Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
踝关节扭伤
强的松龙阻滞
金黄膏外敷
电针
ankle sprain
prednisolone blocking
golden plaster
electro-acupuncture
