期刊文献+

全身麻醉复合双侧胸椎旁神经阻滞在非体外循环冠脉搭桥术的应用 被引量:16

Application of bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia in patientsundergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨双侧胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全麻在非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCABG)应用的效果.方法 择期拟行OPCABG患者60例,年龄50~75岁,体重56~85 kg,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级.采用随机数字表法将患者均分为两组:双侧胸椎旁神经阻滞复合全麻组(P组)和单纯全麻组(G组).P组患者麻醉诱导前经T3~4间隙行双侧胸椎旁间隙穿刺置管,两侧分别注射试验剂量0.375%罗哌卡因5 ml,5 min后分别给予首次量0.375%罗哌卡因15ml,然后分别持续泵入0.375%罗哌卡因5 ml/h.P组测定阻滞平面后,两组患者均置入漂浮导管后行全麻诱导.记录芬太尼用量、P组患者痛觉阻滞平面;记录置入漂浮导管后(Ta)、开胸骨后(Tb)、血管桥吻合完毕(Tc)和术毕(Td)的HR、MAP、CVP、平均肺动脉压(MPAP)、心脏指数(CI)、肺动脉阻塞压(PAOP)、体循环阻力指数(SVRI)和肺循环阻力指数(PVRI);记录术中窦性心动过缓、窦性心动过速、低血压和高血压的发生率以评价循环的稳定性;记录患者术后ICU滞留时间、术后并发症及不良反应.结果 P组患者痛觉阻滞平面T(5.2±0.8)节段,P组芬太尼用量明显低于G组(P<0.05);Tc、Td时P组患者CVP、SVRI和PVRI明显低于G组,Td时CI明显高于G组(P<0.05);P组患者窦性心动过速和高血压的发生率明显低于G组(P<0.05);P组患者术后拔管时间和ICU滞留时间明显短于G组(P<0.05);两组术后并发症及不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义.结论 双侧胸椎旁阻滞复合全麻可安全、有效地应用于OPCABG,镇痛完善,循环稳定. Objective To investigate the feasibility of bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).Methods Sixty patients,aged 50-75 y,weighing 56-85 kg,ASA Ⅱ or lⅢ,scheduled for OPCABG,were randomly divided into two groups(n =30 each):bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia group (group P) and pure general anesthesia group(group G).For patients in group P,bilateral thoracic paravertebral block and insertion epidural catheter were performed at T3-4 interspace prior to induction of anesthesia.A test dose of 5 ml of 0.375% ropivacacine was injected through the catheter in two sides; 5 mins later,an initial dose of 15 ml of 0.375% ropivacacine was injected; followed by an infusion of 0.375% ropivacacine at the rate of 5 ml/h.Consumption of fentanyl in both groups and dermatomes of hypoalgesia in group P were recorded.The parameters of hemodynamics were measured after Swan-Ganz catheterization (Ta),sternotomy(Tb),anastomosis of graft vessel (Tc) and at the end of operation(Td).The stability of circulation was evaluated.Residence time in ICU,complications and side effects after operation were recorded.Results Dermatomes of hypoalgesia was (5.2±0.8) segments in group P.Consumption of fentanyl in group P was significantly lower than that in group G(P<0.05).Compared with group G,CVP,SVRI and PVRI at Tc,Td were significantly lower (P<0.05)and CI was significantly higher at Td in group P.The incidences of sinus tachycardia and hypertension in group P were significantly reduced than in group G(P<0.05).Compared with group G,extubation time and residence time in ICU were shortened significantly in group P (P< 0.05).There were no significant differences in complications and side effects after operation between the two groups.Conclusion Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia could be used safely and efficiently in OPCABG with high-quality analgesia and stable circulation.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期213-216,共4页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 青岛市医药科研指导计划(2011-WSZD035)
关键词 胸椎旁神经阻滞 全身麻醉 冠状动脉搭桥术 Thoracic paravertebral block General anesthesia Coronary artery bypass
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Olivier JF,Bracco D,Nguyen P,et al.A novel approach forpain management in cardiac surgery via median sternotomy:bilateral single-shot paravertebral blocks.Heart Surgery Fo-rum,2007,10(5):E357-362.
  • 2王明山,尹燕伟,华震,于文刚,宋建防,王世端.高胸段硬膜外阻滞对非停跳冠状动脉搭桥术患者围术期血浆内皮素及心钠素水平的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(7):585-587. 被引量:4
  • 3Davies RG,Myles PS,Graham JM.A comparison of the an-algesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epiduralblockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-anal-ysis of randomized trials.Br J Anaesth,2006,96(4):418-426.
  • 4宋金玲,孙立新,王明山.椎旁神经阻滞或硬膜外阻滞复合全麻对开胸手术炎性反应的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2013,29(5):472-474. 被引量:55
  • 5Canto M,Sa’nchez MJ,Casas MA,et al.Bilateral paraver-tebral blockade for conventional cardiac surgery.Anaesthesi-a,2003,58(4):365-370.
  • 6Harle CC,Ganapathy S.Paravertebral analgesia for cardiacsurgery.Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag,2008,12(1):57-63.
  • 7Thavaneswaran P,Rudkin GE,Cooter RD,et al.Brief re-ports:paravertebral block for anesthesia:a systematic review.Anesth Analg,2010,110(6):1740-1744.
  • 8Dhole S,Mehta Y,Saxena H,et al.Comparison of continu-ous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for postopera-tive analgesia after minimally invasive direct coronary arterybypass surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth? 2001,15(3):288-292.
  • 9芮燕,岳云,吴雅峰,赵秋华.非停跳冠脉搭桥术中病人心脏形态和功能的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(6):515-518. 被引量:9
  • 10Naja Z,Lonnqvist PA.Somatic paravertebral nerve block-ade.Incidence of failed block and complications.Anaesthesi-a,2001,56(12):1184-1188.

二级参考文献31

  • 1李治安.经食道超声心动图学(第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.149-156.
  • 2Burfeind WR Jr, Duhaylongsod FG, Samuelson D, et al. The effects of mechanical cardiac stabilization on left ventricular performance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1998, 14: 285-289.
  • 3Junnann MT, Menon AK, Haeberle L, et al. Left ventricular geometry and cardiac function during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 66: 1082-1086.
  • 4Mishra M, Malhotra R, Mishra A, et al. Hemodynamic changes during displacement of the beating heart using epicardial stabilization for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2002, 16: 685-690.
  • 5Mathison M, Edgerton JR, Jeffrey L, et al. Analysis of hemodynamic changes during beating heart surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg,2000,70:1355-1361.
  • 6Grundeman PF, Borst C, Herwaarden JA, et al. Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the Octopus tissue stabilizer: influence on coronary flow. Ann Thorac Surg, 1998, 65: 1348-1352.
  • 7Nierich AP, Diephuis J, Jansen EWL, et al. Embracing the heart:perioperative management of patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting using the Octopus tissue stabilizer. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 1999, 13: 123-129.
  • 8Geskes GG, Dekker AL, Vander Veen FH, et al. The enabler right ventricular circulatory support system for beating heart coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999,68:1558-1561.
  • 9Biswas S, Clements F, Diodato L, et al. Changes in systolic and diastolicfunction during multivessel off-pump coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2001, 20:913-917.
  • 10Hannu J, Martti VK, Paivi K, et al. Myocardial metabolism and hemodynamics during coronary surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.Ann Thorac Surg, 1999,67 : 683-688.

共引文献65

同被引文献129

  • 1王武涛,韩彬,赵玲,李争卫,党旭云,李静.超声引导下连续胸椎旁神经阻滞对肺癌根治术后患者肺功能影响[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2019,26(S01):57-58. 被引量:8
  • 2曾敏,李守军,王旭,晏馥霞,闫军,刘迎龙.婴儿期简单先天性心脏病矫治术后快速康复及相关风险因素研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(7):2107-2109. 被引量:10
  • 3黄燕娟,黄国勇,甘伟耀,林盛敏,冉雪莲.胸科术后椎旁阻滞镇痛对应激反应的影响[J].河北医药,2005,27(3):177-178. 被引量:2
  • 4黄悦,陈煜,杭燕南,白洁,孙瑛,周泓.瑞芬太尼用于婴幼儿快通道心脏手术麻醉[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2006,26(5):523-526. 被引量:11
  • 5Scott DA, Evered LA, Silbert BS. Cardiac surgery, the brain, and inflammation[J]. J Extra Corpor Technol, 2014, 46(1): 15-22.
  • 6Fujita J, Itabashi Y, Seki T, et al. Myocardial cell sheet therapy and cardiac function[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2012, 15(10): 1169-1182.
  • 7Plicner D, Mazur P, Sadowski J, et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and oxidative stress following coronary artery bypass grafting: associations with postoperative outcome[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 45(5): 136-141.
  • 8Dhole S, Mehta Y, Saxena H, et al. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravcrtebral blocks for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery[J]. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 2008, 11 (2): 91-96.
  • 9Mangano DT, Silieiano D, Hollenberg M, et al. Postoperative myocardial isehemia theoprapentic trials using intensive analgesia following surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 1992, 76(3): 342-353.
  • 10Lagow EE, Leeper BB, Jennings LW, et al. Incidence and severity of respiratory insufficiency detected by transeutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring after cardiac surgery and intensive care unit discharge[J]. Proe (Bayl Univ Med Cent), 2013, 26(4): 373-375.

引证文献16

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部