社会政策如何构建父职?——对瑞典、美国和中国的比较被引量：32

How Does Social Policy Construct Fatherhood? Comparing Sweden, U.S.A and China

导出

摘要男性如何承担父职是全社会共同构建的,社会政策的作用至为关键。瑞典和美国的社会政策显示,由于二者对社会福利的根本目的、对亲密关系与家庭形式的理解存在巨大差异,从而使两国的父职构建路径分别属于社会民主主义和市场自由主义。相形对照之下,中国目前父职构建的路径属于市场自由主义与保守主义的结合,亟需变革。 How men fulfill their fatherhood is socially constructed and social policy plays a key role. Sweden and the USA have differences in defining the purposes of social welfare, and understanding intimate relationships and family types. Their paths whereby they construct fatherhood expends from social democracy to market liberalism. By comparison, the current Chinese construction of fatherhood combines market liberalism with conservatism, urgently in need of changes.

作者王向贤

机构地区天津师范大学政治与行政学院社会学系

出处《妇女研究论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期49-54,共6页 Journal of Chinese Women＇s Studies

关键词父职社会民主主义市场自由主义亲密关系 fatherhood, social democracy, market liberalism, intimate relationship

分类号 C913.13 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Hobson, B. & Morgan, D.. Introduction: Making Men into Fathers[A]. In B. Hobson (Ed.). Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
2Gφbsta Esping-Andersen. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism[M]. Princeton University Press, 1990.
3Heclo, S. & Madsen, H.. Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism[M]. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1987.
4卡尔·波兰尼著,冯钢,刘阳译.大转型:我们时代的政治与经济起源[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2007.
5Scruggs, L.A. & Allan, J.P.. Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for the Twenty-first Century: Revisiting the Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism[J]. World Politics, 2008,60(4).
6Fatherhood Initiative, Father Facts Sheet[Z]. 2011.
7Sylvester, K. & Reich, K.. Making Fathers Counts: Assessing the Progress of Responsible Fatherhood Efforts[R]. Social Policy Action Network & Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2002.
8菲力浦·阿利埃斯著,沈坚、朱晓罕译.儿童的世纪:旧制度下的儿童和家庭生活[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
9Hojgaard, L..Working Fathers Caught in the Web of the Symbolic Order of Gender[J]. A CTA Sociology, 1997,(40).
10Brandth, B. & Kvande, E.. Fleksible Fedre[M]. Oslo: University Press, 2003.

二级参考文献13

1齐良书.议价能力变化对家务劳动时间配置的影响——来自中国双收入家庭的经验证据[J].经济研究,2005,40(9):78-90. 被引量：69
2高永平.中国传统财产继承背后的文化逻辑——家系主义[J].社会学研究,2006(3):167-187. 被引量：28
3[英]安东尼·吉登斯.社会学[M].李康,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2009.
4Edholm F, Harris O, Young K. 'Conceptualising Women', Critique of Anthro-pology, Vol. 9/10, No. 3 1977,101 - 30.
5Bakker I. Social reproduction and the constitution of a gen- dered political economy, New Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 4, December 2007.
6Chen, Lanyan, Gender and Chinese Development: To- wards an Equitable Society, Taylor & Francis, 2008.
7刘伯红,张永英,李亚妮.工作和家庭的平衡:中国的问题与政策研究报告[R].国际劳动组织,2008.
8Lundberg U, Mardberg B, Frankenhaeuser M. 1994, The total workload of male and female white collar workers as related to age, occupational level, and number of children, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35, pp. 315 - 327.
9Quisumbing AR, Maluccio JA. 1999, Intrahousehold allo- cation and gender relations: new empirical evidence, Poli- cy Research Report on Gender and Development, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
10Amato PR, Rivera F. Paternal Involvement and Children' s Behavior Problems. Journal of Marriage & Family, 1999,61(2) :375- 384.