期刊文献+

基于随机n价实验拍卖的消费者食品安全风险感知与补偿意愿研究 被引量:19

Consumers' Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Willingness to Accept:Based on a Random nth-price Auction
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以橙汁中的添加剂为例,采用随机n价拍卖机制模拟真实的市场环境,引入Tobit模型与多元线性模型,考察消费者使用鲜榨橙汁交换含有添加剂的橙汁时,愿意接受的补偿意愿以及橙汁中添加剂的正、负面信息对消费者食品添加剂风险感知的影响。结果表明:消费者对橙汁添加剂的负面信息赋予更高的权重,对橙汁添加剂具有较高补偿意愿的并不是对添加剂不了解的消费者,而是有些了解的消费者;对信息的加工能力、对自身及家人健康的关注程度以及对信息后果预见能力等变量都对消费者的补偿意愿产生影响;消费者的补偿意愿具有锚定效应,受其初始报价的影响显著。因此,及时且准确地发布有关食品安全风险的信息,努力在源头上遏制媒体尤其是食品网络舆情对消费者食品安全风险的误导,基于消费者群体间的差异采用不同的交流策略,消除消费者的食品安全恐慌是构建食品安全风险交流机制最基本的内容。 In this study,a real market environment was simulated via a random nth-price auction.Consumers' willingness to accept orange juice containing additives in place of freshly squeezed orange juice,as well as the effects of positive and negative information of orange juice additives on consumers' risk perceptions of food additives,was then examined using Tobit and multivariate linear models.Finally,three findings were obtained,a.Negative information of orange juice additives was given a higher weight by consumers;consumers with some knowledge about additives,rather than those without knowledge about additives,had a higher willingness to accept,b.Information processing capacity,concern about the health of themselves and their families,and the ability to foresee the consequences of information had an impact on consumers' willingness to accept,c.The initial bid had a significant anchoring effect on consumers' willingness to accept.Therefore,the most basis task in building the food safety risk communication mechanism is to eliminate consumers' scares about food safety by disclosing timely and accurate information about food safety risks,preventing misguidance in food safety risks by the media,especially online public opinion about food,at the source,and employing different communication strategies based on the differences among consumer groups.
出处 《中国农村观察》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期60-72,94,共13页 China Rural Survey
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"基于消费者偏好的可追溯食品消费政策的多重模拟实验研究:猪肉的案例"(项目编号:71273117) "食品安全网络舆情演化机理与应对策略研究"(项目编号:71303094) 国家软科学计划项目"中国食品安全消费政策研究"(项目编号:2013GXQ4B158) 江苏省自然科学基金项目"基于复杂网络的食品安全舆情的演化机理与动力学仿真研究"(项目编号:BK2012126) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队建设项目"中国食品安全风险防范研究"(项目编号:2013011)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Zvolensky, M. J.; Eifert, G H.; Lejuez, C. W.; Hopko, D. R.; Forsyth, J. P.: Assessing the perceived predictability of anxiety-related events: a report on the perceived predictability index, Journal of behavior therapy and experimentalpsychiatry, 31 (3): 201-218, 2000.
  • 2Cope, S.; Frewer, L. J.; Houghton, J.; Rowe, G; Fischer, A. R. H.; Jonge, J.: Consumer perceptions of best practice in food risk communication and management: Implications for risk analysis policy, Food Policy, 35(4): 349-357, 2010.
  • 3Frewer, L. J.; Howard, C.; Hedderley, D. and Shepherd, R.: What determines trust in information about food related risks? Underlying psychological comtructs, Risk analysis, 16(4): 473-486, 1996.
  • 4Tolman, E. C.: Purposive behavior in animals and men, New York." Century, 1932.
  • 5Hole, A.R. and Kolstad, J.R.: Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment, Empirical Economics, 42(2): 445-469, 2012.
  • 6Dickinson, D. L. and Bailey, D.: Meat traceability: Are US consumers willing to pay for it? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(2): 348-364, 2002.
  • 7Rousu, M.C.; Huffman, W.E.; Shogren, J.F. and Tegene, A.: Estimating the Public Value of Conflicting Information: The Case of Genetically Modified Foods, Land Economics, 80(1): 125-135, 2004.
  • 8Lusk, J.L.; House, L.O.; Valli, C.; Jaeger, S. R.; Moore, M.; Morrow, J. L.; Traill, W. B.: Effects of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(2): 179-204, 2004.
  • 9Ward, R.; Bailey, D. V. and Jensen, R.: An American BSE crisis: has it affected the value of traceability and country-of-origin certifications for US and Canadian beef?. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 8(2): 92-114, 2005.
  • 10Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, No. 47, 263-291, 1979.

二级参考文献81

  • 1刘毅.从非典引发的心理恐慌看政府公信力的重要性[J].广州社会主义学院学报,2003,1(3):68-71. 被引量:9
  • 2胡弘弘.论公民意识的内涵[J].江汉大学学报(人文科学版),2005,24(1):70-74. 被引量:53
  • 3张玲,王洁,张寄南.转基因食品恐惧原因分析及其对策[J].自然辩证法通讯,2006,28(6):57-61. 被引量:8
  • 4陈峰.提高全民对食品营养及安全的认知是解决食品安全问题的关键[J].中国食品学报,2006,6(6):1-3. 被引量:9
  • 5Codex Alimentarius Commission.Procedural manual[EB/OL].[2009-03-22].Ftp://ftp.Fao.org/codex/Publications/ProcManuals/ Manaual_16c.Pdf.
  • 6Summary of evaluations performed by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives[EB/OL].[2008-10-01].http:// www.inchem,org/documents/jecfa/jeceval/jec_2171,htm
  • 7WHO.Experts set tolerable level for melamine intake[EB/OL].[2009-03-28].http://www,who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/ 2008/pr48/en/.
  • 8陈君石,吴水宁.食品安全//曾光.中国公共卫生与健康新思维.北京:人民出版社,1990:400-424.
  • 9专家认为:中国政府此次处理奶粉事件的效率和力度前所未有[EB/OL].[2008-10-01].http://news.xinhuanet.com/ newscenter/2008-09/21/content_10085380.htm
  • 10Food safety risk analysis:a guide for national food safety authorities[EB/OL].[2009-03-08].http://www,who.int/ foodsafety/publications/micro/riskanalysis06,en.

共引文献153

同被引文献294

引证文献19

二级引证文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部