期刊文献+

靶向治疗对多发性骨髓瘤患者疗效及生存的影响 被引量:2

Influence of targeted therapy on curative effect and survival of multiple myeloma patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨分子靶向治疗(沙利度胺、来那度胺或硼替佐米)对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者疗效及生存的影响.方法 回顾性分析217例自1989年至2013年上海交通大学附属第一人民医院血液科收治的MM患者治疗情况,对比不同时期诊治患者的生存情况,分析治疗措施的改进对患者疗效及生存的影响.结果 基于靶向治疗的普及从1998年后开始,1998年之后确诊的MM患者较之前确诊患者的生存期有显著改善.共有75例患者在初始治疗中接受了沙利度胺或硼替佐米治疗,其疗效优于接受MP、VAD等传统方案的患者.在复发、进展阶段中接受靶向治疗的患者有49例,其疗效较传统方案占优.共有16例患者接受了自体或异基因造血干细胞移植,其中接受自体及异基因双移植的有4例,其疗效及生存期较其他未接受移植治疗的患者占优.结论 分子靶向治疗的应用提高了MM的疗效,并进一步使患者的生存时间得到延长. Objective To investigate the influence of molecular targeted therapy (thalidomide, lenalidomide or bortezomib) on survival and curative effect of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods The treatment of 217 patients diagnosised as MM from 1998 to 2013 were reviewed. The survival of patients who were diagnosed during different periods were compared, and the impact of improved treatment on the survival and curative effect of patients were analyzed. Results Patients who were recently diagnosed as MM after 1998 had better survival. 75 patients with targeted therapy (thalidomide or bortezomib) for their early treatment had better survival compared to the patients with conventional treatments of MP/VAD. 49 patients with targeted therapy after relapse or progression had a better curative effect than those with conventional treatments. 16 patients had auto-ASCT or allo-SCT, and 4 of them had both auto-ASCT and allo-SCT, who had better survival than patients without transplantation. Conclusion Patients treated with molecular targeted therapy (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) had a better curative effect and longer survival.
出处 《白血病.淋巴瘤》 CAS 2014年第2期100-102,106,共4页 Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 分子靶向治疗 生存期 生存率 Multiple myeloma Molecular targeted therapy Survival time Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. term survival of younger patients Recent major improvement in long- with multiple myeloma [J]. Blood, 2008, 111: 2521-2526.
  • 2Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55: 74-108.
  • 3陈世伦.多发性骨髓瘤的治疗现状[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2011,20(11):641-644. 被引量:13
  • 4Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CACancer J Clin, 2012, 62: 10-29.
  • 5赵敏,屈晓燕,陈丽娟.多发性骨髓瘤治疗最新进展:第53届美国血液学会年会报道[J].白血病.淋巴瘤,2012,21(1):10-12. 被引量:6
  • 6Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf I, van der Holt B, et al. HOVON- 65/GMMG-HD4 randomized phase HI trial comparing bortezomib, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (PAD) Vs VAD followed by high-dose melphalan (HI)M) and maintenance with bortezomib or thalidomide iIn patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM)[J]. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2010, 116: 40.
  • 7Rosino| L, Cibeira MT, Mateos MV, et al. Phase 1~ PETHEMA/GEM study of induction therapy prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma: superiority of VTD (bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone) over TD and VBMCP/VBAD plus bortezomib[J]. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2010, 116: 307.
  • 8Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma[J]. Blood, 2012, 119: 4375-4382.
  • 9Rajkumar S, Blood EA, Vesole D, et al. Phase Ill clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 431-436.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood, 2008, 111: 2516 -2520.
  • 2Pineda-Roman M, Zangari M, Hssler J, et al. Sustained complete remissions in multiple myeloma linked to bortezomib in total therapy 3: comparison with total therapy 2. Br J Haematol, 2008, 140: 625- 634.
  • 3Cavo M, Patriarca F, Tacchetti P. Superior complete response rate and progression-free survival after autologous transplantation with up-front velcade-thalidomide-dexamethasone compared with thalidomide- dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [abstract]. Blood, 2008, i12: 158.
  • 4Attal M, Haroussean JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in muhiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335: 91-97.
  • 5Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase ]II US Intergroup Trial $9321. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 929-936.
  • 6Spencer A, Prince HM, Roberts AW, et al. Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27: 1788-1793.
  • 7Gulbrandsen N, Waage A, Gimsing P, et al. A randomised placebo controlled study with melphalan/ prednisone vs melphalan/prednisone/tbalidomide:quality of life and toxicity [abstract]. Haematologica, 2008, 93: 0209.
  • 8Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia,2009, 23: 3-9.
  • 9Lee CK, Barlogie B, Munshi N, et al. DTPACE: an effective,novel combination chemotherapy with thalidomide for previously treated patients with myeloma. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21: 2732-2739.
  • 10Anderson K, Jagannath S, Jakubowiak A, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexametbasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): encouraging outcomes and tolerability in a phase 11 study [abstract 8536]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27.

共引文献16

同被引文献24

  • 1Eslick R,Talaulikar D.Mu|tiple myeloma :from diagnosis to treatment[J].Aust Fam Physician, 2013,42(10) :654-688.
  • 2Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A.C ancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2012,62( 1 ) : 10-29.
  • 3Caers J, Withofs N, Hillengass J, et al.The role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow up ofmultiple myeloma[J].Haematologica, 2014,99 (4) : 629-637.
  • 4Kyle RA,Rajkumar SV.Criteria for diagnosis,staging,risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma [J].Leukemia, 2009,23 ( 1 ) : 3-9.
  • 5Durie BGM.A clinical staging system for multiple myelo- ma:correlation of measured,myeloma cell mass with pre- senting clinical features,response to treatment,and sur- vival[J].Cancer, 1975,36(3) : 842-854.
  • 6Greipp PR, Jesus SM, Durie BGM,et al.International stag- ing system for multiple myeloma[J].J Clin Oneol, 2005,23 (15) : 3412-3420.
  • 7Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z,et aLCancer statistics, 2014 [J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2014,64(1 ) :9-29.
  • 8Riccardi A, Mora O, Brugnatelli S, et aLRelevance of age on survival of 341 patients with multiple myeloma treated with conventional therapy:update results of the MM 87 prospective randomized protocal[J].Br J Cancer, 1998,77 (3) :485-491.
  • 9Corso A,Klersy C,Lazzarino M,et d.Multiple myeloma in younger patients :the role of age as prognostic factor [J].Ann Hematol, 1998,76(2) : 67-72.
  • 10Siegel DS, Desikan KR, Mehta J,et d.Age is not a prog- nostic variable with autotransplants for multiple myeloma [J].Blood, 1999,93 ( 1 ) : 51-54.

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部