期刊文献+

泌乳素诱导蛋白表达下调对三阴性乳腺癌细胞裸鼠体内成瘤影响研究 被引量:2

Effect of prolactin-inducible protein downregulation on the growth of triple-negative breast cancer xenograft in nude mice
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨泌乳素诱导蛋白(prolactin-inducible protein,PIP)表达下调对三阴性乳腺癌(triple negative breast cancer,TNBC)MDA-MB-453细胞在裸鼠体内成瘤的影响。方法:采用脂质体将PIP siRNA转染至乳腺癌MDA-MB-453细胞,蛋白质印迹法检测PIP的表达下调情况。采用4周龄BALB/c雌性裸鼠,建立乳腺癌MDA-MB-453细胞裸鼠皮下种植瘤模型,瘤内注射siRNA-脂质体混悬液,观察PIPsiRNA对肿瘤生长的影响。采用免疫组织化学法检测肿瘤组织中Cyclin D1和VEGF的表达情况。结果:PIP表达下调后,其在裸鼠体内成瘤能力明显降低,肿瘤平均体积空白对照组为(1 075±65)mm3,阴性对照组为(1 095±72)mm3,实验组为(473±56)mm3,空白对照组与阴性对照组差异无统计学意义,P=0.719,空白对照组与实验组、实验组与阴性对照组差异均有统计学意义,P<0.001。空白对照组肿瘤平均体质量为(908±86)mg,阴性对照组为(889±64)mg,实验组为(272±30)mg,空白对照组与阴性对照组差异无统计学意义,P=0.738,空白对照组与实验组、实验组与阴性对照组差异均有统计学意义,P<0.001。肿瘤生长抑制率为71.1%。免疫组化结果显示,PIP表达下调的肿瘤组织中Cyclin D1的相对表达量空白对照组为1 535±78,阴性对照组为1 594±123,实验组为367±72,空白对照组与阴性对照组差异无统计学意义,P=0.472,空白对照与实验组、实验组与阴性对照组差异均有统计学意义,P<0.001。VEGF的相对表达量空白对照组为4 270±558,阴性对照组为4 365±324,实验组为1 286±292,空白对照组与阴性对照组差异无统计学意义,P=0.758,空白对照与实验组、实验组与阴性对照组差异均有统计学意义,P<0.001。结论:下调PIP基因表达可明显抑制乳腺癌MDA-MB-453细胞体内成瘤能力,提示PIP可能在乳腺癌发生和发展中发挥重要作用。 OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects of prolactiwinducible protein (PIP) downregulatng the growth of human MDA-MB-453 breast cancer xenograft in nude mice. METHODS:PIP siRNA was transfected into human triple-neg ative breast cancer MDA MB-453 cells through liposome. Western blot was employed to confirm the downregulated ex- pression of PIP. Four-week-old BALB/c female nude mice were adopted to establish a subcutaneously tumor-bearing model. The inhibitory effects of siRNA on tumor growth were assessed by intraturotumoralinjection of siRNA-liposome com plex. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to examine the expressions of Cyclin D1 and VEGF. RESULTS:Knock down of PIP obvioulsy inhibited the growth of breast cancer xenograft in nude mice. The tumor volume in blank-control, negative-control and experimental group was (1 075±65) mm3 ,(1 095±72) mm3 and (473±56) mm3. There was no sig nificant difference between the blank control and negative control (P=0. 719). There was significant difference between the experimental group and the blank control and the negative control group (P〈0. 001). The tumor mass in blank-con- trol,negative-control and experimental group was (908 ± 86) rag, (889± 64) mg and (272 ±30) mg respectively.There was no significant difference between the blank control and negative control group (P=0. 738). There was signifi cant difference between the experimental group and the blank control and the negative control group (P〈0. 001). Inhibi tion ratio of tumor volume reached 71. 1%. Moreover,PIP siRNA markedly downregulated the expressions of Cyclin D1 and VEGF. The expression of Cyclin D1 in blank-control, negative-control and experimental group was 1 535±78,1 594±123 and 367 ± 72 respectively. There was no significant difference between the blank control and negative control(P = 0. 472). There was significant difference between the experimental group and the blank control and the negative control group (P〈%0. 001). The expression of VEGF in blank-control, negative-control and experimental group was 4 270 ± 558, 4 365±324 and 1 286±292 respectively. There was no significant difference between the blank control and negative con trol (P=0. 758). There was significant difference between the experimental group and the blank control and the negative control group (P〈0. 001). CONCLUSION.. Reduced PIP expression in MDA-MB-453 cells can inhibit breast cancer growth in vivo, which suggests that PIP plays an important role in the tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer cells.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第4期260-264,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 国家十二五重大新药创制平台子课题(2012ZX09303016-002)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 泌乳素诱导蛋白 RNA干扰 小鼠 细胞周期素D1 血管内皮生长因子 prolactin-inducible protein breast neoplasms RNA interference nude mice Cyclin D1 vascular endotheli-al growth factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2) :69-90.
  • 2Carey L, Winer E, Viale G, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience? [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2010,7(12) : 683-692.
  • 3Hudis CA, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer:an unmet medical need[J]. Oncologist,2011,16(Suppl 1) :1-11.
  • 4Honma N, Takubo K, Akiyama F, et al. Expression of GCDFP-15 and AIR decreases in larger or node positive apocrine carcinomas of the breast[J]. Histopathology,2005,47(2):195-201.
  • 5Fritzsche FR, Thomas A, Winzer KJ, etal. Co-expression and prog nostic value of gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and mammaglobin in primary breast cancer[J]. Histol Histopathol, 2007,22 ( 11 ) : 1221- 1230.
  • 6Yoo BK,Emdad L,Su ZZ, et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 regu- lates hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression[J]. J Clin Inves,2009,199(3) :465-477.
  • 7Kitano T,Tian W,Umetsu K,et al. Origin and evolution of gene for prolactin-induced protein[J]. Gene, 2006,383 (4) : 64-70.
  • 8Hassan MI, Waheed A, Yadav S, et al. Prolactin inducible protein in cancer, fertility and immunoregulation: structure, function and its clinical implications[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2009,66(3) : 447- 459.
  • 9Clark JW, Snell L, Shiu RP, et al. The potential role for prolactin- inducible protein (PIP) as a marker of human breast cancer mi- crometastasis[J]. Br J Cancer, 1999,81(6) : 1002-1008.
  • 10Ring AE, Zabaglo L,Ormerod MG,et al. Detection of circulating epithelial cells in the blood of patients with breast cancer: corn parison of three techniques[J]. Br J Cancer, 2005,92 (5) : 906- 912.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F,Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics [J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2011 ,61 (2 ) :69 -90.
  • 2Honma N, Takubo K , Akiyama F, et al. Expression of (iCI)FP-15 and AK decreases in larger or node-posilive apocrine carcinomas of I he breast [ J ]. Hislopathology ,2005 ,47 (2) : 195 -201.
  • 3Kritzsohe FR, Thomas A , Winzer KJ, et ai. Co-expression ami prognostic value of gn>ss cystic disease fluid protein 15 and mani-maglol)iii in primary breast t^ancer[ J ]. Hislol Histopathol ,2007,22(11) :1221 -1230.
  • 4Carey L, Winer E, Viale G,et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience? [ J ]. Nat Kev Clin Oncol,2010,7?12) :683 -692.
  • 5Pal SK, Childs BH, Pegram M. Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need[ J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2011 ,125 (3) :627 -636.
  • 6Kitano T, Tian W, Umetsu K, et al. Origin and evolution of gene for prolactin-induced protein [ J ]. Gene,2006,383 : 64 -70.
  • 7Hassan Ml, Waheed A, Yadav S, et al. Prolactin inducible protein in cancer, fertility and immunoregulation : structure, function and its clinical implications[ J]. Cell Mol Life Sci ,2009 ,66 (3):447 -459.
  • 8Clark JW, Snell L, Shiu RP, et al. The potential role for prolac-tin-inducible protein ( PIP) as a marker of human breast cancer micrometastasis[ J]. Br J Cancer,1999,81 (6) :1002 - 1008.
  • 9Ring AE, Zabaglo L, Ormerod MG, et al. Detection of circulat-ing epithelial cells in the blood of patients with breast cancer :comparison of three techniques[ J]. Br J Cancer,2005 ,92 (5 ): 906 -912.
  • 10Tian W,Osawa M, Horiuchi H, et al. Expression of the prolac-tin-inducible protein ( PIP/GCDFP15 ) gene in benign epithelium and adenocarcinoma of the prostate[ J]. Cancer Sci,2004,95(6):491 -495.

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部