期刊文献+

弹性髓内针固定治疗大龄儿童严重移位肱骨近端骨折 被引量:7

TREATMENT OF SEVERE DISPLACED PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES WITH TITANIUM ELASTIC NAILS IN OLDER CHILDREN
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价弹性髓内针固定治疗大龄儿童严重移位肱骨近端骨折的疗效。方法回顾分析2009年4月-2012年7月,采用2根弹性髓内针逆行固定治疗的31例严重移位肱骨近端骨折患儿临床资料。男23例,女8例;年龄10~15岁,平均12.8岁。致伤原因:运动伤16例,交通事故伤11例,高处坠落伤4例。伤后至手术时间为6 h^7 d,平均72 h。骨折按Neer-Horwitz分型标准:Ⅲ型17例,Ⅳ型14例;按部位分为干骺端骨折21例,骨骺骨折10例。结果骨折均获得满意复位及稳定固定,其中闭合复位23例,开放复位8例。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无感染、血管神经损伤等并发症发生。患儿均获随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均20个月。X线片复查示骨折均愈合,愈合时间7~10周,平均8周。随访期间无因骺板早闭或骨桥形成导致的患肢生长紊乱和成角畸形。末次随访时,肩关节功能Neer评分为83~100分,平均95.7分。患儿肩关节外形、活动均正常,无疼痛;患侧上肢长度为(67.68±2.56)cm,与健侧(67.61±2.54)cm比较,差异无统计学意义(t=—1.867,P=0.072)。结论弹性髓内针固定治疗大龄儿童严重移位肱骨近端骨折安全、有效,并发症少。 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of titanium elastic nails for severe displaced proximal humeral fractures in older children. Methods Between April 2009 and July 2012, 31 cases of severe displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated with closed or open reduction and fixation with 2 titanium elastic nails, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 boys and 8 girls, aged from 10 to 15 years (mean, 12.8 years). The causes of injury were sports injury (16 cases), traffic accident (11 cases), and falling from height (4 cases). The interval from injury to operation was 6 hours to 7 days (mean, 72 hours). According to Neer-Horwitz classification, 17 cases were rated as type III fracture and 14 cases as type IV fracture. There were 21 cases of metaphyseal fractures and 10 cases of epiphyseal fractures. Results Satisfactory reduction of fracture and stable fixation were obtained in all patients (closed reduction in 23 cases and open reduction in 8 cases). Primary healing was achieved in all incisions; no infection and neurovascular injury occurred. All patients were followed up 12-36 months with an average of 20 months. X-ray films showed that all fractures healed at 7-10 weeks (mean, 8 weeks). During follow-up, no disturbance of development or angulation deformity caused by premature physeal closure or bone bridge formation was observed. At last follow-up, the average Neer score of the shoulder was 95.7 (range, 83-100). The appearance and motion of the shoulder were normal. There was no significant difference in the upper extremity length between affected side and contralateral side [(67.68 ± 2.56) cm vs. (67.61 ± 2.54) cm; t= — 1.867, P=0.072]. Conclusion Titanium elastic nails for severe displaced humeral fractures in older children is a safe and effective method with a low complication incidence.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期345-348,共4页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 弹性髓内针 内固定 大龄儿童 Proximal humeral fracture Titanium elastic nail Internal fixation Older children
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1李衡,张伯锋,张英泽,赵昌平,任栋,齐向北,侯志勇.微创手术治疗严重移位的大年龄儿童肱骨近端骨折[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2006,27(2):108-109. 被引量:11
  • 2Larsen CF,Kiaer T,Lindequist S.Fractures of the proximal humerus in children.Nine-year follow-up of 64 unoperated on cases.Acta Orthop Scand,1990,61(3):255-257.
  • 3Beringer DC,Weiner DS,Noble JS,et al.Severely displaced proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures:a follow-up study.J Pediatr Orthop,1998,18 (1):31-37.
  • 4Dobbs MB,Luhmann SL,Gordon JE,et al.Severely displaced proximal humeral epiphyseal fractures.J Pediatr Orthop,2003,23 (2):208-215.
  • 5Rose SH,Melton LJ 3rd,Morrey BF,et al.Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1982,168(1):24-30.
  • 6Fernandez FF,Eberhardt O,Langend(o)rfer M,et al.Treatment of severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in children with retrograde elastic stable intramedullary nailing.Injury,2008,39(12):1453-1459.
  • 7Dameron TB Jr,Reibel DB.Fractures involving the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51 (2):289-297.
  • 8Beaty JH.Fractures of the proximal humerus and shaft in children.Instr Course Lect,1992,41:369-372.
  • 9Schwendenwein E,Hajdu S,Gaebler C,et al.Displaced fractures of the proximal humerus in children require open/closed reduction and internal fixation.Eur J Pediatr Surg,2004,14(1):51-55.
  • 10Burgos-Flores J,Gonzalez-Herranz P,Lopez-Mondejar JA,et al.Fractures of the proximal humeral epiphysis.Int Orthop,1993,17(1):16-19.

共引文献25

同被引文献82

  • 1于跃波.弹性髓内钉与锁定钢板内固定治疗儿童肱骨骨折的疗效比较[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(5):156-156. 被引量:2
  • 2慕明章,唐伟,杨建平.克氏针髓内交叉固定治疗儿童肱骨干骨折[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2006,27(9):495-496. 被引量:5
  • 3Feerick EM, Kennedy J, Mullett H, et al. Investigation of metallic and carbon fibre peek fracture fixation devices for three-part proximal humeral fractures. Med Eng Phys, 2013, 35(6): 712-722.
  • 4HuffLR, Taylor PA, Jani J, et al. Proximal humeral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison of two constructs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(1): 129-136.
  • 5Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Williams DK. Locked plating of proximal humeral fractures: is function affected by age, time, and fracture patterns? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(12): 3307-3316.
  • 6Sohn HS, Shin SJ. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: clinical and radiologic outcomes according to fracture type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(9): 1334- 1340.
  • 7layaseelan DJ, Post AA, Ruggirello LD, et al. Midshaft humeral fracture following a proximal humeral fracture: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2014, 9(7): 1014-1020.
  • 8Namdari S, Lipman AJ, Ricchetti ET, et al. Fixation strategies to prevent screw cut-out and malreduction in proximal humeral fracture fixation. Clin Orthop Surg, 2012, 4(4): 321-324.
  • 9Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Soderqvist A, et al. Quality of life and functional outcome after a 2-part proximal humeral fracture: a prospective cohort study on 50 patients treated with a locking plate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(6): 814-822.
  • 10Pawaskar AC, Lee KW, Kim JM, et al. Locking plate for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly population: serial change of neck shaft angle. Clin Orthop Surg, 2012, 4(3): 209-215.

引证文献7

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部