期刊文献+

基于改进TOPSIS法的舰船总体方案群决策方法 被引量:15

Group Decision-Making Method for Warship Based on Improved TOPSIS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 从系统效能的定义出发,构建了简化的舰船系统效能评估体系;根据群决策理论的基本假设,建立了舰船总体方案的群决策权重确定方法,提出了置信度矩阵的概念;构建了群体判断矩阵优化模型,运用粒子群优化算法对群体判断矩阵进行修正,以保证其判断一致性和群体一致性;引入基于改进TOPSIS法的决策方法、距离与灰色关联度相结合的贴近度公式,以保证最优方案与理想方案的位置和曲线形状的一致性.通过应用实例结果表明,所提出的舰船总体方案群决策方法具有较好的可行性. From the definition of system performance, a simplified evaluation system for warship system performance was constructed. Based on the fundamental assumption of group evaluation, the group evaluation weighting making method for warship overall scheme forms and the concept of confidence matrix were proposed. By building the group judgement matrix optimization model, particle swarm optimization (PSO) was used to revise judgement matrix, to assure judgement consistency and group consistency of group judgement matrix; the decision-making method based on improved TOPSIS for evaluation, and the combination of distance and grey correlation degree in the similarity degree formula was introduced to ensure the consistency of location and curve shape of optimal scheme and ideal scheme, and enhance the comprehen siveness of the decision-making rules. The application example proved that the decision-making method was feasible as a new method for ship overall scheme evaluation.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期92-97,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51309061) 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2012M512133) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(T013513015)资助
关键词 舰船总体方案 群决策 判断矩阵 一致性 改进理想点法 warship overall scheme group decision making judgment matrix consistency improved TOPSIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1丘菀华;刘美芳.管理决策及其应用[M]{H}北京:机械工业出版社,2012127-128.
  • 2Arrow K J. Social choice and individual values[M].{H}New York:John Wiley & Sons,1963.3-8.
  • 3Clerc M,Kennedy J. The particle swarm-explosion,stability,and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space[J].{H}IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,2002,(6):58-73.
  • 4宋宝贵;沈如松;周文松.武器系统工程[M]{H}北京:国防工业出版社,2009116-117.
  • 5Brown A,Juan S. Multiple-objective optimization in naval ship design[J].{H}Naval Engineers Journal,2003,(4):49-61.
  • 6杨善心;刘心报.GDSS中判断矩阵的两种集结方法[J]{H}计算机学报,2003(11):57-66.
  • 7Satty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M].{H}New York:McGraw-Hill,1980.29-68.
  • 8金菊良;魏一鸣.复杂系统广义智能评价方法与应用[M]{H}北京:科学出版社,200744-45.
  • 9Hwang C L,Yoon K S. Multiple attribute decision making[M].{H}New York:Springer-Verlag,1981.29-56.
  • 10乔永辉.一种基于TOPSIS的多属性决策方法研究[J].企业技术开发,2006,25(9):89-91. 被引量:33

二级参考文献21

共引文献245

同被引文献148

引证文献15

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部