期刊文献+

高、低社交焦虑青少年情绪调节策略使用比较(英文) 被引量:10

Emotion Regulation Strategies in the High and Low Social Anxiety Teenagers
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究以13-18岁的青少年为研究对象,采用社交焦虑量表调查青少年的社交焦虑水平,采用情绪调节问卷调查青少年的情绪调节策略使用频率,比较高社交焦虑青少年和低社交焦虑青少年情绪调节策略使用(认知重评和表达抑制)情况。研究结果显示,高社交焦虑青少年使用认知重评策略的频率显著低于低社交焦虑青少年,使用表达抑制策略的频率显著高于低社交焦虑青少年,这种现象受年龄因素的调节,在13岁青少年组中,高社交焦虑青少年(n=40)使用认知重评策略的频率显著高于低社交焦虑青少年(n=40),使用表达抑制策略的频率显著低于低社交焦虑青少年;在14岁和15岁青少年组中,高社交焦虑青少年(n=40)使用认知重评策略的频率显著高于低社交焦虑青少年(n=40),两组被试在使用表达抑制策略的频率上不存在显著性差异;在15岁、16岁和17岁青少年组中,高社交焦虑青少年(n=40)和低社交焦虑青少年(n=40)使用认知重评和表达抑制策略不存在显著性差异。 To explore the difference of emotion regulation between teenagers with low and high social anxiety. The So- cial Anxiety Subscale of the Self-Consciousness Scale was used to study social anxiety, and the Emotion Regulation Ques- tionnaire was used to evaluate the frequency of emotion regulation strategy use, in 588 teenagers with age from 13 to 18. The frequency of emotion regulation strategy use(cognitive reappraisal and suppression) in teenagers with high and low so- cial anxiety was compared. The results showed that high social anxiety teenagers used cognitive reappraisal less than low so- cial anxiety teenagers, while suppression was more frequently used by high social anxiety teenagers. This result was moder- ated by age. In the 13-year-old group, participants with high social anxiety used less cognitive reappraisal, and more sup- pression, than low social anxiety participants. In 14- and 15-year-olds, high social anxiety participants used more cogni- tive reappraisal than low social anxiety participants, and there was no difference in the use of suppression. Finally, there were no differences in the use of these two strategies between high and low social anxiety teenagers aged 16-18.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期149-154,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 supported by the The Young Teacher Research Capacity Advancement Program of Northwest Normal University(SKQ-NYB12009) Open Research Fund of the Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology and Science education programs in Gansu Province(GS[2013]GHBZ086)
关键词 社交焦虑 情绪调节 青少年 认知重评 表达抑制 Social anxiety Emotion regulation Cognitive reappraisal Suppression
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1杨阿丽,方晓义,林丹华.父母冲突、青少年应对策略及其与青少年社会适应的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(1):37-43. 被引量:24
  • 2池丽萍.认知评价在婚姻冲突与儿童问题行为之间的作用:中介还是缓冲[J].心理发展与教育,2005,21(2):30-35. 被引量:36
  • 3杨阿丽,方晓义,涂翠平,李红菊.父母冲突、青少年的认知评价及其与青少年社会适应的关系[J].心理与行为研究,2007,5(2):127-134. 被引量:37
  • 4Hayes SC,Wilson KG,Gifford EV,et al.Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders:A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,1996,64(6):1152-1168
  • 5Mennin DS,Heimherg RG,Turk CL,et al.Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder.Clinical Psychology:Science and Practice,2002,9(1):85-90
  • 6Cloitre M.Sexual revictimization:Risk factors and prevention.In V.M.Follette,J.I.,Ruzek,& F.R.Abueg(Eds.),Cognitivebehavioral therapies for trauma.New York:Guilford Press,1998:278-304
  • 7Gratz KL.Risk factors for and functions of deliberate self-harm:An empirical and conceptual review.Clinical Psychology.Science and Practice,2003,10(2):192-205
  • 8Bushman BJ,Baumeister RF,Phillips CM.Do people agree to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs,affect regulation opportunity,and aggressive responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy,2001,81(1):17-32
  • 9Gross JJ.Emotion regulation:past,present,future.Cognition and Emotion,1999,13(5):551-573
  • 10Gross JJ.Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation:divergent consequences for experience,expression t and physiology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(1):224-237

共引文献311

同被引文献107

引证文献10

二级引证文献148

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部