期刊文献+

幸福感整合模型在不同年龄及性别群体的验证 被引量:20

Test the Integrated Model of Well-being in Different Ages and Gender
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:以幸福感整合理论为基础,检验幸福感的整合模型。方法:调查了3192位不同年龄阶段城市居民主观幸福感、心理幸福感和社会幸福感。结果:①相关分析证实主观幸福感、心理幸福感和社会幸福感之间显著正相关;②幸福感的整合模型在不同年龄阶段及不同性别群体具有跨年龄及性别群体的良好信效度。结论:幸福感整合模型(包括主观幸福感、心理幸福感和社会幸福感)得到检验,具有较好的信效度。 Objective: This study explored the integration model of well-being in Different Ages and Gender. Meth- ods: A total of 3192 Chinese residents completed the subjective well-being scale, the psychological well-being scale and social well-being scale. Explorative and confirmatory factor analysis techniques were used to test a series of models in order to confirm the proposed latent structures of subjective well-being, psychological well-being and social well-being, and ex- amine whether these models could be validated successfully with the different age and gender groups. Results: (~)the corre- lation analysis on subjective well-being scale, the psychological well-being scale and social well-being indicated that there are remarkably positive correlations among them; @)the proposed latent structures of subjective well-being scale, the psy- chological well-being scale and social well-being had stable validity and reliability across different age and gender groups of Chinese residents. Conclusion: Based upon previous theoretical and empirical works, the present study shows the inte- grated model of the subjective well-being, psychological well-being and social well-being has stable validity and reliability in Chinese people.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期78-83,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 中央财政专项(华中科技大学自主创新基金)资助(2013WT007)
关键词 主观幸福感 心理幸福感 社会幸福感 整合模型 不同年龄群体 Subjective well-being Psychological well-being Social welt-being Integration model Different ages
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Diener E. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 34-43.
  • 2洪雷,曹慧,方格.金钱态度、主观幸福感和心理健康的关系探讨[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(3):297-299. 被引量:21
  • 3Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and sub- jective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003, 54(1): 403-425.
  • 4Seligman MEP. Positive psychology: An introduction. Amer- ican Psychologist, 2000, 55(1): 5-14.
  • 5陈志霞.城市幸福指数及其测评指标体系[J].城市问题,2012(4):9-13. 被引量:29
  • 6Howell RT, Howell CJ. The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-anal- ysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2008, 134(4) : 536-560.
  • 7Diener E, Ng W, Harter J, Arora R. Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation,whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010, 99(1): 52-61.
  • 8Rentfrow P, Mellander C, Florida R. Happy states of Ameri- ca: A state-level analysis of psychological, economic, and social well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 2009, 43(6): 1073-1082.
  • 9Stevenson B, Wolfers J. Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008. 1-87.
  • 10Fischer R, Boer D. What is more important for national well- being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Rese- arch in Personality, 2011, 101(1): 164-184.

二级参考文献149

共引文献837

同被引文献313

引证文献20

二级引证文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部