期刊文献+

《保险法》第17条司法解释规则评析——基于民法动态规制理论 被引量:4

On the Defects and Remedy of Judicial Interpretationof Article 17 of Insurance Law——Based on Civil Law Dynamic Principle Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 追求意思自治与保障给付均衡是合同规制两大原理,两者具有动态互补关系。针对格式合同场合,发展出缔约信息义务与内容控制规则。司法解释(二)对《保险法》第17条的解释呈现出形式化倾向,致使保险消费者缔约信息保护功能被弱化。因此,须强化对保险格式条款之内容控制,注意发挥《保险法》第19条及相关条文的规范功能。因保险法的内容控制规则较为粗糙,应细化不当条款类型,积极谨慎进行法律适用。 Autonomy of contract and equilibrium of payments are the main principles in contract laws, and there exists a complementary relationship between these two principles. In order to regulate standard clauses, such regulations as Pre-contractual Duties of Information and the Control of Contents have been developed. As the judicial interpretation 11 of Article 17 of Insurance Law lends towards mere formality, the Article' s consumer protection function is weakened. Therefore, we must reinforce the control of contents of standard clauses by strengthening the regulariza- tion function of Article 19 and other relevant articles in Insurance Law. Because the content control rules in the Insurance Law are simple and crude, we should refine the Improper Clause categories and apply the law prudently
作者 鲁忠江
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期91-97,共7页 Insurance Studies
关键词 《保险法》第17条 司法解释(二) 《保险法》第19条 格式条款规制 Article 17 of the Insurance Law judicial interpretation Article 19 of the Insurance Law rules on standard clauses
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献50

共引文献199

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部