期刊文献+

应用德尔菲法研究慢性阻塞性肺疾病发展“快”“慢”评价标准问卷分析 被引量:1

Delphi analysis on development speed of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用德尔菲法探讨COPD患者病情发展“快”“慢”的评价标准。方法在前期流行病学调查、文献研究及第1轮专家问卷的基础上,编制第2轮“慢性阻塞性肺疾病发展快、慢评价标准”专家咨询表,发送给中华医学会呼吸病学分会涉及10个省及直辖市的20位专家进行问卷调查,对答卷进行回收,并采用德尔菲法进行分析。结果专家积极系数为100%,专家权威程度为82.57%,在发展慢评价标准的主要指标中肺功能≤Ⅱ级、病程≥15年满分比均〉60%,变异系数均〈O.3,次要指标中各项满分比均〉60%,变异系数均〈0.3;在发展快评价标准的主要指标中肺功能≥Ⅲ级、病程≤5年满分比均〉60%,变异系数均〈0.3,次要指标中除BMI%21kg/m2外,其余满分比均〉60%,变异系数均〈0.3。结论COPD病情发展“快”“慢”评价标准的框架及条目基本得到专家认可,为之后研究病情发展速度不同的两组患者的相关研究提供有力依据。 Objective To discuss the standard of the development speed of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by Delphi. Methods To compile to second round consultation form of "the standard of development speed of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease" which is based on the preview research, documents study and first round experts' questionnaires, and to send out to experts of Chinese Medicine Association Respiratory Branch, and then to collect the data to analyze with Delphi Method. Results The expert positive coefficients are 100%, the authority coefficients is 82.57%. For the main index in tile slow development standard, the lung function is lower than level two, the period of the disease is longer and equal than 15 years, all the ratio marks over 60%, and the coefficient of variation is lower than 0.3; the items in the secondary index, all the ratio marks over 60%, and the coefficient of variation is lower than 0.3. For the main index in the fast development standard, the lung function is higher and equal than level three, the period of the disease is shorter and equal than 5 years, all the ratio marks over 60%, and the coefficient of variation is lower than 0.3; the items in the secondary index, all the ratio marks except BMI is lower than 21 that is over 60%, and the coefficient of variation is lower than 0.3. Conclusions The frame of the standard has been accepted by the experts, and to provide the basis for the future research on the different development of the disease.
出处 《国际呼吸杂志》 2014年第3期181-184,共4页 International Journal of Respiration
基金 国家自然科学基金(81260590)
关键词 德尔菲法 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 发展 Delphi method Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Development
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Efstathiou N,Ameen J,Coll AM. A delphi study to identify healthcare users' priorities for Cancer care in Greece[J].European Journal of Oncology Nursing,2008.362-371.
  • 2Elmer F,Seifert I,Kreibich H. A delphi method expert survey to derive standards for flood damage data collection[J].RISK ANALYSIS,2010.107-124.
  • 3缪春玉,张绍蓉,曾琴,李燕萍,郝娜.德尔菲法构建医患纠纷数据库的研究[J].重庆医学,2012,41(12):1234-1235. 被引量:5
  • 4刘弘,经燕,辛茜庭.中医治疗痛经指南指标德尔菲法调查分析[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2008,14(3):238-240. 被引量:23
  • 5Pastor AC,Osman F,Teitelbaum DH. Development of a standardized definition for Hirschsprung' s-associated enterocolitis:a Delphi analysis[J].Journal of Pediatric Surgery,2009.251-256.
  • 6夏萍,吴大嵘,卢传坚,许星莹,张伟璇,庄岩,袁秀琴,曹重乡.Delphi法在医疗质量评价指标体系中的可靠性分析[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(14):3488-3490. 被引量:26
  • 7曾光;李辉.现代流行病学方法与应用[M]北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994250-259.
  • 8关勋强;李瑞兴;刘运成.医学研究生教育评价研究与实践[M]北京:军事医学科学出版社,200012.
  • 9王静,杨燕,盛燕,李歆.德尔菲法小儿脾虚泻专家问卷调查分析[J].北京中医药,2010,29(12):891-894. 被引量:10
  • 10Moussa A,Bridges Webb C. Quality of care in general practice.A delphi study of indicators and methods[J].Australian Family Physician,1994.465-468.

二级参考文献33

共引文献97

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部