期刊文献+

Quantification of viable bacteria in wastewater treatment plants by using propidium monoazide combined with quantitative PCR(PMA-qPCR) 被引量:5

Quantification of viable bacteria in wastewater treatment plants by using propidium monoazide combined with quantitative PCR(PMA-qPCR)
原文传递
导出
摘要 The detection of viable bacteria in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is very important for public health, as WWTPs are a medium with a high potential for waterborne disease transmission. The aim of this study was to use propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PMA-qPCR) to selectively detect and quantify viable bacteria cells in full-scale WWTPs in China. PMA was added to the concentrated WWTP samples at a final concentration of 100 μmol/L and the samples were incubated in the dark for 5 min, and then lighted for 4 min prior to DNA extraction and qPCR with specific primers for Escherichia coli and Enterococci, respectively. The results showed that PMA treatment removed more than 99% of DNA from non-viable cells in all the WWTP samples, while matrices in sludge samples markedly reduced the effectiveness of PMA treatment. Compared to qPCR, PMA-qPCR results were similar and highly linearly correlated to those obtained by culture assay, indicating that DNA from non-viable cells present in WWTP samples can be eliminated by PMA treatment, and that PMA-qPCR is a reliable method for detection of viable bacteria in environmental samples. This study demonstrated that PMA-qPCR is a rapid and selective detection method for viable bacteria in WWTP samples, and that WWTPs have an obvious function in removing both viable and non-viable bacteria. The results proved that PMA-qPCR is a promising detection method that has a high potential for application as a complementary method to the standard culture-based method in the future. The detection of viable bacteria in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is very important for public health, as WWTPs are a medium with a high potential for waterborne disease transmission. The aim of this study was to use propidium monoazide (PMA) combined with the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PMA-qPCR) to selectively detect and quantify viable bacteria cells in full-scale WWTPs in China. PMA was added to the concentrated WWTP samples at a final concentration of 100 μmol/L and the samples were incubated in the dark for 5 min, and then lighted for 4 min prior to DNA extraction and qPCR with specific primers for Escherichia coli and Enterococci, respectively. The results showed that PMA treatment removed more than 99% of DNA from non-viable cells in all the WWTP samples, while matrices in sludge samples markedly reduced the effectiveness of PMA treatment. Compared to qPCR, PMA-qPCR results were similar and highly linearly correlated to those obtained by culture assay, indicating that DNA from non-viable cells present in WWTP samples can be eliminated by PMA treatment, and that PMA-qPCR is a reliable method for detection of viable bacteria in environmental samples. This study demonstrated that PMA-qPCR is a rapid and selective detection method for viable bacteria in WWTP samples, and that WWTPs have an obvious function in removing both viable and non-viable bacteria. The results proved that PMA-qPCR is a promising detection method that has a high potential for application as a complementary method to the standard culture-based method in the future.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第2期299-306,共8页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51178242) the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Reserch Program (No. 20121087922) the Program of Changjiang Scholars and Innovation Research Team in University
关键词 propidium monoazide quantitative PCR WWTPs E. coli Enterococci propidium monoazide quantitative PCR WWTPs E. coli Enterococci
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Ahmed,W,Goonetilleke,A,Powell,D,Chauhan,K.,Gardner,T. Comparison of molecular markers to detect fresh sewage in environmental waters[J].{H}Water Research,2009.4908-4917.
  • 2Ahmed W,Sawant S,Huygens E,Goonetilleke A.,Gardner T. Prevalence and occurrence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens in surface waters determined by quantitative PCR[J].{H}Water Research,2009.4918-4928.
  • 3Asano,T,Burton,E L,Leverenz,H.L,Tsuchihashi,R.,Tchobanoglous,G. Issues,Technologies,and Applications[A].McGraw-Hill Professional,New York,1997.94-102.
  • 4Bae,S,Wuertz,S. Discrimination of viable and dead fecal bacteroidales bacteria by quantitative PCR with propidium monoazide[J].{H}APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY,2009.2940-2944.
  • 5Chinese Environmental Protection Administration. The monitoring method of water and wastewater quality[M].Chinese Environmental Science Press,Beijing,2002.
  • 6Haugland,R.A,Siefring,S.C,Wymer,L.J,Brenner,K.P Dufour,A.P. Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis[J].{H}Water Research,2005.559-568.
  • 7He,J.W,Jiang,S. Quantification of Enterococci and human adenoviruses in environmental samples by real-time PCR[J].Applied and Environ Microbiol,2005.2250-2255.
  • 8Heijnen,L,Medema,G. Quantitative detection of E.coli,E.coli O157 and other shiga toxin producing E.coli in water samples using a culture method combined with real-time PCR[J].J Water Health,2006.487-498.
  • 9Hrudey,S.E,Huck,P.M,Payment,P,Gillham,R.W Hrudey,E.J. Walkerton:Lessons learned in comparison with waterborne outbreaks in the developed world[J].J Environ Eng Sci,2002.397-407.
  • 10Kay,D,Crowther,J,Stapleton,C.M,Wyer,M.D Fewtrell,L Edwards,A.. Faecal indicator organism concentrations in sewage and treated effluents[J].{H}Water Research,2008.442-454.

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部