摘要
梁涛等学者按自己主观需要,运用有学术争议的出土资料,构造自己想象的"学理",错误地解读了"亲亲相隐"等案例。该研究思路存在以下误区:第一,以线性思维解读儒家经典,形成早期儒家思想是从简单原始的"情"逐渐发展为抽象僵硬的"理"之机械的线性过程;第二,以化约主义的方法解读儒家经典,将当代社会中腐败等复杂问题,简单化约为儒家思想与现代化的问题;第三,把情理绝对地对立起来,把人情都讲成私情,再以空洞的"普遍正义"的"理"作为立足点,将自己作为"人子"之天然存在的主体身份拱手让渡,抽离于活生生的生活世界之外。儒家伦理与其中有关"亲亲相隐"的论说,其实都是极为复杂的问题。复杂性的问题不能简单处理,在理解上应避免直线式思考与非此即彼的方式。以终极信仰与道德的普遍性为背景的儒家的角色伦理、处境伦理的体验方式,饱含着具体理性,以简单抽象的方式去对待,在理解上或不能相应。
Some scholars, such as Liang Tao, subjectively employed the unearthed materials with disputes to fabricate an imagined ＂theory＂ while misinterpreted the cases like Qinqin Xiangyin（kin＇s withholdings, 亲亲相隐 ）.The misinterpretations in their studies lie firstly by a linear thinking in interpreting Confucian classics, secondly by a reductionist way in interpreting, and thirdly by absolutely contradicting emotion and reason. The theory of kin＇s holdings in Confucian ethics is, in fact, rather complicated, which could not be tackled with any simple method. The Confucian ethics of roles and situation, with ultimate belief and moral as its background, is full of concrete reasons, which should not be understood by simple and abstract ways.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期58-66,共9页
Academic Monthly
关键词
儒家
亲亲相隐
线性思维
化约主义
Confucius, Mencius, Qinqin Xiangyin, linear thinking, reductionism
