期刊文献+

贮草期布氏田鼠采食距离及集群数量对采食量的影响 被引量:8

Influence of Foraging-trip Distance and Group Size on Food Intake of Lasiopodomys brandtii in Food Storing Period
原文传递
导出
摘要 在内蒙古典型草原区锡林郭勒盟研究了贮草期布氏田鼠(Lasiopodomys brandtii)采食距离及集群数量对采食量的影响。通过人为设置布氏田鼠洞群家族成员数量和采食距离,采用小麦(Triticum aestivum)为采食材料,测定了秋季自由生活状态下,采食距离为5-30 m范围内、每个洞群布氏田鼠数为3-11只范围内,布氏田鼠单次采食量的变化。结果表明,采食距离和家族成员数量对布氏田鼠单次采食量没有明显影响,采食距离和家族成员数量之间也不存在交互作用。布氏田鼠单次搬运麦粒数量平均为8.0粒/次,这可能与田鼠的搬运能力有关。 We evaluated the effects of foraging-trip distance and social group sizes on the amount of single trip' s food collection of the Brandt’s vole(Lasiopodomys brandtii) during the food storing period in typical steppes in Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia. Wheat(Triticum aestivum) was provided as supplemental food at food stations in different distances to the center of burrow systems to measure the amount of food collection of Brandt’s voles on each single foraging trip. We manipulated the group size of the voles from 3 to 11 individuals, and foraging-trip distance from 5 to 30 meters in this study. The vole can carry about 8.0 wheat seeds on average on each foraging trip. Results show that the amount of food collection of Brandt’s voles was not related to either foraging-trip distances or group sizes. Moreover, there was no direct interaction between foraging-trip distance and group size.
出处 《动物学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期24-30,共7页 Chinese Journal of Zoology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.30671380 30971929) 公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(No.201203041)
关键词 布氏田鼠 采食行为 采食量 采食距 Lasiopodomys brandtii Feeding behavior Feed intake Feeding distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Benkman C W. Feeding behavior,flock-size dynamics,and variation in sexual selection in Crossbills[J].The Auk,1997,(2):163-178.
  • 2Bertram C R. Living in groups:predators and prey[A].{H}Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,1978.64-96.
  • 3Caraco T. Time budgeting and group size:a theory[J].{H}ECOLOGY,1979,(3):611-617.
  • 4Hamilton W D. Geometry for the selfish herd[J].{H}Journal of Theoretical Biology,1971,(2):295-311.
  • 5Jonsson P,Koskela E,Mappes T. Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents?Two large-scale experiments[J].{H}Oecologiea,2000,(4):487-492.
  • 6Kotler B P,Brown J S,Hasson O. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation[J].{H}ECOLOGY,1991,(6):2249-2260.
  • 7Pulliam H R. On the advantages of flocking[J].{H}Journal of Theoretical Biology,1973,(2):419-422.
  • 8Randall J A,Boltas King D K. Assessment and defence of solitary kangaroo rats under risk of predation by snakes[J].{H}Animal Behaviour,2001,(3):579-587.
  • 9Roberts G. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases[J].{H}Animal Behaviour,1996,(5):1077-1086.
  • 10Tchabovsky A V,Krasnov B,Khokhlova I S. The effect of vegetation cover on vigilance and foraging tactics in the fat sand rat Psammomys obesus[J].{H}Journal of Ethology,2001,(2):105-113.

二级参考文献181

共引文献227

同被引文献92

引证文献8

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部