摘要
马克斯·韦伯视中国古代法律为"非理性"法,且属于"卡迪司法"。这一论断在西方和中国学术界引起了持久的争论。本文以韦伯著作中的相关概念和定义为评价标准,结合中国古代法制史史实对韦伯及其支持者和反对者的观点进行了研究和辩证分析,得出了韦伯及其支持者观点"既有正确一面,又有不正确一面"的结论,同时用史实对上述结论进行了充分的论证。
Max Weber claims that traditional Chinese law, belonging to ＂Kadi justice,＂ is non-rational law, which results in long-lasting debates among Western and Chinese scholars. Based on related concepts and definitions in Weber^s works as well as facts of the traditional Chinese law history, the paper studies and dialectically analyzes the views of both opponents and supporters of Weber, concluding that the views of Weber and his supporters is neither totally right nor totally wrong. The conclusion is sufficiently justified with historical facts.
出处
《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期101-109,共9页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
