摘要
分析了避险专用管线技术,指出煤矿井下安全避险"六大系统"采用避险专用管线,可提高煤矿井下安全避险"六大系统"管线抗灾变能力;但由该专用管线派生出的煤矿井下专用管线避险系统,无法替代煤矿井下通信系统、监测监控系统和人员定位系统,更不能感知灾害。对比分析了救生舱和避难硐室技术特点,指出救生舱具有易受灾害影响、需降温、成本高等缺点。提出煤矿应装备大功率潜水泵;水灾钻孔救援要慎重。提出区队长和班组长宜是兼职救护队员。提出交接班工作尽量在地面完成,以减少井下人员。
The paper analyzed special pipeline technology for emergency refuge,and pointed out that ＂six systems＂with the special pipeline for underground safe refuge can improve anti-disaster ability of pipeline,but the underground safe refuge system derived from the special pipeline cannot replace coal mine communication system,monitoring and control system and personnel positioning system,and it cannot perceive disasters.It compared and analyzed technical characteristics of life-saving shelter and refuge chamber,pointed out that the life-saving shelter has shortcomings of being susceptible by disaster,needs cooling and high cost.It put forward that coal mine should be equipped with high-power submersible pump,and should be careful to use rescue equipments of flood drilling.It proposed area captain and group leaders should be part-time draegerman.It also proposed that hand-over works should try to be completed on the ground,so as to reduce underground personnel.
出处
《工矿自动化》
北大核心
2014年第1期1-4,共4页
Journal Of Mine Automation
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目(51134024)
国家自然科学基金项目(51074169)
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2012AA062203)
关键词
紧急避险
应急救援
避险管线
救生舱
避难硐室
潜水泵
钻孔救援
emergency refuge
emergency rescue
pipeline of refuge
life-saving shelter
refuge chamber
submersible pump
drilling rescue
