期刊文献+

不同分子亚型浸润性乳腺癌治疗后生存情况分析 被引量:14

Survival analysis for different molecular subtypes of breast cancers after treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨不同分子亚型浸润性乳腺癌的治疗后生存情况.方法 采用回顾性分析,收集2000年1月至201 1年7月在北京肿瘤医院乳腺癌预防治疗中心确诊并在本院完成治疗4491例浸润性乳腺癌病例,根据病例的激素受体状态(HR)、人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)的免疫组织化学结果(HER2++的患者进行了FISH检测),将所有病例分为:HR +/HER2-、HER2阳性及HR-/HER2-3个亚型,分析不同分子亚型乳腺癌治疗后生存情况,并分析各分子亚型在不同淋巴结状态下的生存情况.结果 HR +/HER2-(2504例)、HER2阳性(680例)及HR-/HER2-型(1085例)的3年无复发生存(RFS)率分别为94.9%、89.5%与92.3%,生存曲线之间的差异有统计学意义,P =0.0001;淋巴结阳性与淋巴结阴性的3年RFS率分别为87.1%与97.8%,生存曲线之间的差异有统计学意义,P<0.01;淋巴结阴性组3种亚型的乳腺癌RFS生存曲线间的差异无统计学意义,P =0.102;而在淋巴结阳性组HR +/HER2-型的RFS明显优于HR-/HER2-型与HER-2阳性型,生存曲线之间的差异有统计学意义,P =0.001.结论 不同分子亚型乳腺癌的治疗后生存情况不同,淋巴结状态可能是更重要的影响因素. Objective To explore the survival status after treatment for patients with different molecular subtypes of breast cancers.Methods A total of 4491 patients with invasive breast cancer from January 2000 to July 2011 were retrospectively recruited to receive pathological verification and treatment at our clinic.According to the immunohistochemical results of hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2),they were assigned into 3 groups of HR +/HER2-,HER2 + and HR-/ HER2-.Survival analyses were conducted to examine the effects of molecular subtypes and lymph node status on survival.Results The 3-year recurrence free survival for HR +/HER2-,HER2 + and HR-/ HER2-were 94.9%,89.5% ane 92.3% respectively.Different molecular subtypes presented different survival patterns (P =0.0001).The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for LN + and LN-was 87.1% and 97.8% respectively.And statistical difference existed (P 〈 0.01).No difference was detected among three molecular subtypes of LN-(P =0.102) ; However,for LN + patients,HR +/HER2-showed a higher RFS than HER2 + and HR-/HER2 (P =0.001).Conclusion Different molecular subtypes of breast cancers have varying survival.And lymph node status is probably an important prognostic factor.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第46期3663-3666,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 分子亚型 生存 受体 淋巴结 Breast neoplasms Molecular subtypes Survival Receptor Lymph nodes
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Carey LA, Pemu CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. lAMA, 2006,295 : 2492 -2502.
  • 2Perou CM, Serlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors. Nature ,2000,406:747-752.
  • 3Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res ,2007,13:2329-334.
  • 4Yiu W], Lu IS, Di GH, et al. chnicopathological features of the triple-negative tumors in Chinese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2009,115:325-333.
  • 5何奇,王杰,邵玉国,周晓云,邵志敏.三阴性乳腺癌的临床病理特征与预后分析[J].中华医学杂志,2009,89(4):243-247. 被引量:14
  • 6Konecny G, Pauletti G, Pegram M, et al. Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003, 95 : 142-153.
  • 7Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad sci U S A,2003,100:8418-8423.
  • 8Nguyen PL Taqhian AG, Katz MS, et al. Breast Cancer Subtype Approximated by Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and HER-2 Is Associated With Local and Distant Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy. J Clin Oneol, 2008, 26:2373-2378.
  • 9Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC, et al. Breast Cancer Subtypes and Response to Doeetaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Use of an Immunohistochemical Definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 : 1168-1176.
  • 10Harbeck N, Dettmar P, Thomssen C, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor biological factors on survival in node-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res, 1998, 18:2187-2197.

二级参考文献19

  • 1宋传贵,胡震,袁文涛,狄根红,沈镇宙,黄薇,邵志敏.上海地区早发性乳腺癌患者BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变分析[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(43):3030-3034. 被引量:26
  • 2张瑰红,施达仁,梁晓曼,侯景辉,康苏娅,朱卫东,李晓兵,邵云,陈丽荣,周燕.显色原位杂交和免疫组织化学检测乳腺癌HER2/neu基因状况和蛋白表达的对照性研究[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(10):580-583. 被引量:29
  • 3Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001,98 : 10869-10874.
  • 4Brenton JD, Carey LA, Ahmed AA, et al. Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 7350-7360.
  • 5Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10 : 5367-5374.
  • 6Van de Rijn M, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Expression of cytokeratins 17 and 5 identifies a group of breast carcinomas with poor clinical outcome. Am J Pathol, 2002, 161 : 1991-1996.
  • 7Fulford LG, Reis-Filho JS, Ryder K, et al. Basal-like grade Ⅲ invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast : patterns of metastasis and long-term survival. Breast Cancer Res, 2007,9: R4.
  • 8Hicks DG, Short SM, Prescott NL, et al. Breast cancers with brain metastases are more likely to be estrogen receptor negative, express the basal cytokeratin CK5/6, and overexpress HER2 or EGFR. Am J Surg Pathol, 2006, 30: 1097-1104.
  • 9Calza S, Hall P, Auer G, et al. Intrinsic molecular signature of breast cancer in a population-based cohort of 412 patients. Breast Cancer Res, 2006, 8 : R34.
  • 10Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Carvalho S, et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas exhibit ECFR, but not HER2, gene amplification and overexpression: immunohisto chemical and chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis. Breast Cancer Res, 2005, 7: R1028-R1035.

共引文献13

同被引文献98

  • 1曲喆,陈旭红,王琦.辽宁地区常见肿瘤和ABO血型相关性的分析[J].中国现代医生,2007,45(10S):44-46. 被引量:3
  • 2Molina R, Escudero JM, Munoz M, et al. Circulating levels of HER -21 neu oncoprotein in breast cancer [J]. Clin Chern, 2012, 50 :5-21.
  • 3Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for subtypes-dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011 [J] . Ann Oncol, 2011,22: 1736-1747.
  • 4Luftner D, Cheli C, Mickelson K, et al. ADVIA Centaur HER-21 neu shows value in monitoring patients with metastatic breast cancer[J]. Int J BioI Markers, 2004,19:175-182.
  • 5Lam L, McAndrew N, Yee M, et al. Challenges in the clinical utility of the serum test for HER2 ECD [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2012,1826: 199-208.
  • 6Kong SY, Nam BH, Lee KS, et al. Predicting tissue HER2 status using serum HER2 levels in patients with metastatic breast cancer [J]. Clin Chern, 2006,52:1510-1515.
  • 7Ardavanis A, Kountourakis P, K yriakou F, et al. Trastuzumah plus paclitaxel or docetaxel in HER-2-negative/HER-2 ECD?positive anthracycline-and taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer [J]. Oncologist, 2008,13 :361-369.
  • 8Ali SM, Carney WP, Esteva FJ, et al. Serum HER -21 neu and relative resistance to trastuzumah-based therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2008,113: 1294-1301.
  • 9Pierga JY, Hajage D, Bachelot T, et al. High independent prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells compared with serum tumor markers in a large prospective trial in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients [J]. Ann Oncol, 2012,23 :618-624.
  • 10Pedersen AC, Sorensen PD, Jacobsen EH, et al. Sensitivity of CA 15 -3, CEA and serum HER2 in the early detection of recurrence of breast cancer[J]. Clin Chern, 2013,51 :1511-1519.

引证文献14

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部