摘要
与货物贸易相比,服务贸易壁垒比较复杂和隐蔽,如何选取一个恰当的方法,准确地对其进行测度是该领域的研究难点。对该问题的深入研究不仅有助于全面衡量中国服务贸易的开放程度,而且为下一轮贸易谈判提供必要的理论依据。本文通过对服务贸易壁垒的传统测度工具进行分析和比较,对Hoekman提出的频度分析法进行修正。结合服务贸易的特点、各个服务部门在产业经济中的地位、开放程度以及中国在《服务贸易总协定》中的承诺权数,对服务贸易项下的12项大类、46项中类和155项小类分别进行测算,最终得出了中国服务贸易壁垒的频度指标。在此基础上,对中国服务贸易壁垒的特点进行了详细分析,并提出了相应的政策建议。
Compared with trade in goods, barriers in service trade is complicate and obscure. How to find a right method to measure it precisely is a difficult problem in this research field. A deep study of this problem can help to measure China＇s degree of openness in service trade and lay a good theory foundation for next round of trade negotiation. This paper analyzes and compares the traditional measure tools of service trade barriers and revises the frequency analysis method proposed by Hoekman. Connected with characteristics of service trade, different economic status of service industry, degree of openness and China＇s commitment in GATS, this paper computes 12 main sectors,46 branches and 155 subclasses in China＇s service trade, and then gives a final frequency index. On this basis, this paper finds characteristics of China＇s service trade barriers and then proposes some policy suggestions.
出处
《财贸经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期75-83,共9页
Finance & Trade Economics
关键词
服务贸易
贸易壁垒
频度检验
Service Trade, Trade Barrier, Frequency Test
