摘要
在美国可以通过行政途径挑战专利权的有效性,也可以通过司法途径挑战专利权的有效性,专利无效的双轨制同时也引发了程序之间的冲突。在分析两个途径各自结果的效力以及相互间的制约关系的基础上,与我国的专利无效制度进行了比较。
In the United States, we can challenge patent validity by administrative ways as well as judicial ways. The two approaches to challenge patent validity bring about conflicts in different procedures. This paper discusses the results of the two approaches and the restrictive relation between them. Furthermore, this paper also discusses the patent invalidity system in China.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第12期92-97,共6页
Intellectual Property
关键词
无效再审
重审
争点排除
禁反言
invalidity
reexamination
review
issue preclusion
estoppel
