期刊文献+

人的语言能力水平是可比的——Can do理念对汉语能力标准的意义 被引量:10

Language Competence Proficiency of Each Individual Is Comparable
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从制订"汉语能力标准"立论。语言能力是人类普遍具有的能力,而人的语言能力水平是可比的,尽管人们的语言不同,两个人的语言能力不一定完全相同,个体的听、说、读、写技能也不一定平衡。人的语言行为所表现出的语言能力,是can do即"能做某事"的能力,是完成在现实生活中可能遇到的、需要完成的语言任务的能力。语言能力标准又称语言能力量表,是对语言使用者和学习者的语言能力水平的系统描述。语言能力标准主要描述"能做某事"即完成语言任务的语言能力,而不是只描述语言知识和语言技能。语言能力标准是跨语言的,互相之间是可比的。 The paper focuses on the significance of establishing the Chinese Proficiency Scales. Language competence is an ability shared by all human beings. Language competence of each individual, however, is unique yet comparable between different speakers of a same language or even of different languages. The language competence expressed through language performance reflects " can do"--the ability of carrying out the encountered and required language tasks in daily life. Language proficiency scales are the systematic description of the language competence of the users and learners of a language. The scales focus on describing the language competence of " can do"-carrying out the language tasks, rather than merely describing language knowledge and language skills. Language proficiency scales are cross-language scales and the scales used for different languages should be comparable.
出处 《语言文字应用》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期88-97,共10页 Applied Linguistics
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划重点项目"汉语应用能力标准与测试的理论基础与应用研究"(GFA097008)资助
关键词 汉语能力标准 交际语言能力 CAN do理念 跨语言 可比 Chinese Proficiency Scales communicative language competence notion of "can do" cross-language scales comparability
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1漆书清,戴海崎,丁树良.现代教育与心理测量学原理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.239-244
  • 2周庆生,王铁琨.中国语言生活状况报告(2005)[R].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
  • 3周庆生,王铁琨.中国语言生活状况报告(2006)[R].北京:商务印书馆,2007.
  • 4Alderson, J. C. , Bands and scores [ A]. In Alderson, J. C. & B. North. (eds.). Language testing in the 1990s [ C ]. London: Modern English Publications / British Council / Macmillan. 1991.
  • 5American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines Revised [ S ]. Hastings-on-Hudsonm, New York: ACTFL Material Center, 1986.
  • 6Association of Language Testers in Europe, A Description of the Framework q[ the Association of Language Testers in Europe [S]. Cambridge: ALTE Document 4, 1994.
  • 7Association of Language Testers in Europe, The ALTE Can Do Project: Articles and Can Do Statements Produced by the Members of ALTE 1992 - 2002 [ R]. Cambridge: ALTE Document, 2002.
  • 8Bachman, L. F., Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [ M] Oxford: OUP, 1990.
  • 9Bachman, L. F. & A. S. Palmer, Language Assesment in Practice [M]. Oxford: OUP, 2010.
  • 10Canale, M. & M. Swain, Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing [Jl. Applied Linguistics, 1980, Vol. 1 , No. 1.

共引文献5

同被引文献96

引证文献10

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部