期刊文献+

基于CBR-RBR的工程争端诉讼结果预测 被引量:2

Predicting outcome of construction disputes litigation based on CBR-RBR model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 工程项目争端频发,双方最终有可能通过诉讼解决争端。但诉讼成本高昂,破坏双方友好合作关系并影响公司声誉,因此遭到很多学者的反对。为了避免争端双方盲目通过法律途径解决争端,试图对工程争端诉讼结果进行预测,希望争端双方在诉诸法律之前能够认识到自身行为的合理性。提出通过CBR-RBR方法对工程争端诉讼结果进行预测,并首次尝试对预测结果进行数量化处理,以提高CBR-RBR系统的实际应用价值。在此基础上,以"工程缺陷争端"这一争端类型进行实例研究,结果表明该方法对工程缺陷争端结果预测的准确率高达93.75%,而且最终数量结果的偏差也在预期范围之内,说明提出的CBR-RBR方法可以有效地应用于工程争端诉讼结果的预测,为双方解决争端提供科学依据。 The complex nature of construction, participants with different backgrounds, uncertainties and the incompleteness of the contract often lead to disputing in construction industry. Litigation may be an effective way to solve the problem. In order to avoid resolving disputes through litigation blindly, the paper is trying to predict the outcome of the litigation of disputes by using the CBR-RI3R model, so that the parties can know whether their behaviors are reasonable before the resort to the law. The paper proposes a framework of the prediction of litigation outcomes based on CBR-RBR model, then this method is applied to the pre- diction of construction defects disputes. The result shows that the prediction accuracy of construction defects disputes is up to 93.75%, which indicates that the proposed CBR-RBR method can be effectively applied to the field of construction dispute litigation.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 2013年第23期228-234,共7页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.71172147)
关键词 基于案例的推理 基于规则的推理(CBR—RBR) 工程争端 工程缺陷 Case-Based Reasoning-Rule-Based Reasoning(CBR-RBR) construction disputes construction defects
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1FurubotnEG,RichterR.新制度经济学[M].姜建强,罗长远,译.上海:上海三联书店,2010.
  • 2Cheung SO, Yiu T W.Are construction disputes inevitable?[J]. Engineer Management, 2006,52(3) : 456-470.
  • 3陈小光,孟俊娜.国际工程项目争端解决方式分析[J].国际经济合作,2009(4):69-73. 被引量:1
  • 4Gebken RJ, Gibson G E, GrotonJ.Dispute resolution trans?actional cost quantification: what does resolving a construe- tion dispute really cost?[C].IConstruction Research Con?gress 2005: Broadening Perspectives.United States: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005.
  • 5Pena-Mora F, Sosa C E, McCone D S.Introduction to con?struction dispute resolution[M].[S.l.]: Prentice Hall, 2003.
  • 6Pal K.An approach to legal reasoning based on a hybrid decision support system[J].Expert Systems with Applica?tions, 1999 , 17 : 1-12.
  • 7Montani S, Bellazzi R, Portinale L.Multi-model reasoning in diabetic patient management[J].Int[J of Medical Informics, 1999,53: 61-77.
  • 8Hen X, Feng Y Q.Research on negotiation support system based on case based reasoning[C].IProceedings of the 4th International Symp on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Guangzhou, 2005.
  • 9杨振刚,刘伟章,方永美.CFW的CBR动态预测[J].计算机工程与应用,2009,45(6):236-239. 被引量:2
  • 10Liang Zhenqiu.Design of automatic question answering system base on CBR[C]112012 International Workshop on Informa?tion and Electronics Engineering, 2012.

二级参考文献88

共引文献47

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部