期刊文献+

高等教育质量保障中的价值冲突与整合 被引量:19

Value Conflicts and Integration in Quality Assurance in Higher Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 自治与控制、公平与效率、多样化与标准化之间的冲突是现代高等教育质量保障中三种主要的价值冲突。控制压倒自治、效率侵蚀公平、标准化取代多样化作为冲突的结果从根本上制约了高等教育质量保障的有效性,并最终无助于提高高等教育质量。在质量保障和质量提高之间形成一种平衡态势、促进不同行动者对话与协商并且将反思、批判和解放的话语体系引入高等教育质量保障体系是调和三种价值冲突的基本路径。实现不同价值理念之间的平衡,才是现代高等教育提高质量的根本出路。 The conflicts between autonomy and control, equality and efficiency, standardization and diversity are three main conflicts in quality assurance in higher education. The prevailing of control over autonomy, the erosion of equality by efficiency and the displacement of diversity by standardization constrain the effectiveness of quality assurance in higher education. In this context, the aim of quality enhancement cannot be achieved. There are three pathways to reconcile the value conflicts. Foremost, keeping a balance between quality assurance and quality enhancement; Secondly, promoting the dialogue and communication among the actors; Finally, introducing reflective, critical and emancipatory disclosures into the quality assurance. The balance among different values maybe the best way to improve the quality in higher education.
作者 苏永建
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第11期19-25,共7页 China Higher Education Research
关键词 质量保障 控制 效率 标准化 价值冲突 quality assurance control efficiency standardization value conflicts
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Kristensen B. Has External Quality Assurance Actually Improved Quality in Higher Education Over the Course of 20 Years of the ' Quality Revolution' ? [J ]. Quality in Higher Education, 2010, 16(02): 153-157.
  • 2Neave G. The Politics of Quality: Developments in Higher Education in Western Europe 1992-1994[J]. European Journal of Education, 1994, 29(02): 115-134.
  • 3李雪飞.高等教育质量话语权变迁——从内部到外部的历史路径探析[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(4):89-94. 被引量:11
  • 4Neave G. On the Cultivation of Quality, Efficiency and Enterprise: An Overview of Recent Trends in Higher Education in Western Europe, 1986-1988[J]. European Journal of Education, 1988, 23(1/2): 7-23.
  • 5田恩舜.高等教育质量保证体系及其运行机制[J].高教探索,2003(1):14-17. 被引量:53
  • 6Trow M. Managerialism and the Academic Profession: The Case of England[J]. Higher Education Policy, 1994, 7(02): 11-18.
  • 7Harman G. Quality Assurance Mechanisms and Their Use as Policy Instruments: Major International Approaches and the Australian Experience Since 1993[J]. European Journal of Education, 1998, 33(03): 331-348.
  • 8Harvey L, Newton J. Transforming Quality Evaluation[J]. Quality in Higher Education, 2004, 10(02): 149-165.
  • 9Vidovich L, Porter P. Quality Policy in Australian Higher Education of the 1990s: University Perspectives[J]. Journal of Education Policy, 1999, 14(06): 567-556.
  • 10Houston D. Rethinking Quality and Improvement in Higher Education[J]. Quality Assurance in Education, 2008, 16 (01): 61-79.

二级参考文献217

共引文献293

引证文献19

二级引证文献342

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部