期刊文献+

BI-RADS 4B类乳腺肿块的超声造影诊断 被引量:13

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in BI-RADSUS 4B Breast Lesions
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:评价超声造影对常规超声BI-RADS 48类乳腺肿块的进一步鉴别诊断价值。方法:通过分析76个B1-RADS-US 4B类乳腺肿块的造影形态学特征和时间-强度曲线定量参数(AT、TTP、PI),进行超声造影良恶性鉴别诊断,并与术后病理结果进行对照。结果:76个BI-RADS-US 4B类肿块,术后病理结果为恶性47个、良性29个,良恶性组间在造影形态、边界、周围穿入或扭曲血管、内部对比剂分布、造影后有无显著增大方面均具有较显著差异(P<0.05),而定量参数AT、TTP、PI在良恶性组间均无明显差异(P>0.05)。76个BI-RADSUS 4B类肿块中造影诊断恶性51个、良性25个,其敏感性91.5%、特异性72.4%、阳性预测值84.3%、阴性预测值84.0%、准确性84.2%,其中主要是对浸润性导管癌、纤维腺瘤、导管原位癌的诊断准确性较高,分别为94.7%、91.7%、86.7%,反之对炎症的误诊率为100%。结论:超声造影可以对常规超声BI-RADS 4B类乳腺肿块做进一步良恶性鉴别,提高其术前诊断准确率。 Purpose: To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in differential diagnosis of BI-RADS 4B breast lesions. Methods: The CEUS findings of 76 breast lesions of BI-RADS 4B, including morphologic features and time-intensity curve parameters(AT, TTP, PI) were analyzed, and in the end the CEUS diagnoses were made according to our preliminary study results. Histology results were served as golden reference. Results: Of all the 76 BI-RADS 4B breast lesions that were confirmed by histopathology results, 47 were malignant and 29 were benign. The differences of morphologic features of shape, margin, penetrating or tortuous surrounding vessels, heterogeneous or homogeneous distribution, whether the lesion was significant enlarged after contrast enhanced between benign and malignant lesions were with statistical significant (P〈0.05). But the differences of the parameters (including AT, TTP, PI) between the benign and malignant lesions were with no statistical significant in our study (p〉0.05). Fifty-one lesions were diagnosed as malignant, while 25 lesions were diagnosed as benign with CEUS. Its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 91.5%, 72.4%, 84.3%, 84.0% and 84.2%. In all the histological types of these 76 breast lesions, the diagnostic accuracies for invasive ductal carcinoma, fibroadenoma and ductal carcinoma in situ were relatively higher, which were 94.7%, 91.7% and 86.7% respectively. For inflammatory lesions, the diagnostic accuracy was the lowest, and all of them were misdiagnosed. Conclusion: CEUS could be applied as a useful adjunct to conventional ultrasonography for BI-RADS 4B breast lesions. It can improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast lesions preoperatively.
出处 《中国医学计算机成像杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期442-445,共4页 Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
基金 上海市卫生局课题No.201005~~
关键词 乳腺疾病 乳腺影像报告和数据系统 超声造影 Breast lesion Breast imaging reporting and data system Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Yu-Xin Jiang, He Liu, Ji-Bin Liu, et al. Breast tumor size assessment Comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med.& Biol, 2007, 33: 1873-1881.
  • 2Xiaohong Wang, Ping Xu, Yi Wang, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52: 248-255.
  • 3Kedar RP, Cosgrove D, McCready VR, et al. Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US: effect on breast masses. Work in progress. Radiology, 1996, 198: 79-86.
  • 4Du WH, Liu L J, W Hui, et al. The clinical significance of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2012, 63: 117-120.
  • 5汪晓虹,王怡,许萍,富丽娜,王意达.乳腺良恶性病灶的实时灰阶超声造影征象研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2010,16(3):246-249. 被引量:34
  • 6Lazrus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, et al. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology, 2006, 239: 285-391.
  • 7Lee H J, Kim EK, Kim M J, et al. Observer variability of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. J Radiol, 2008, 65: 193-298.

二级参考文献10

  • 1罗慧,罗奕伦,姜燕,冯晓凤,焦阳,彭启慧,彭树松.超声造影增强强度在乳腺肿块诊断中的价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(2):107-110. 被引量:33
  • 2Balleyguier C, Opolon P, Mathieu MC, et al. New potential and applications of contrast - enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Own investigations and review of the literature. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 69: 14- 23.
  • 3Weskott HP. Emerging roles for contrast - enhanced ultrasound. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2008, 40:51 - 71.
  • 4Jiang YX, Liu H, Liu JB, et al. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast - enhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound in Med & Bio, 2007, 33: 1873- 1881.
  • 5Ozdemir A, Kilic K, Ozdemir H, et al. Contrast - enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions: effect on differential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography. J Ultrasound Med, 2004, 23:183 - 195.
  • 6Schneider BP, Miller KD. Angiogenesis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol , 2005, 23: 1782-1790.
  • 7Huber S, Helbich T, Kettenbach J, et al. Effects of a microbubble agent on breast tumors: computer- assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US- early experience. Radiology, 1998, 208:485 - 489.
  • 8罗葆明,肖祎炜,郭庆禄,智慧,文艳玲,杨海云.乳腺肿块超声造影及时间-强度曲线分析再探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志,2008,24(3):216-218. 被引量:26
  • 9张璟,姜玉新,戴晴,孙强,吕珂,谭莉,高嫔.实时灰阶超声造影增强模式在乳腺良、恶性病灶诊断中的应用[J].中国医学科学院学报,2008,30(1):49-53. 被引量:43
  • 10刘赫,姜玉新,刘吉斌,朱庆莉,孙强,常晓燕.超声造影微血管显像测量乳腺病变大小的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(10):1600-1603. 被引量:17

共引文献33

同被引文献122

  • 1罗慧,罗奕伦,姜燕,冯晓凤,焦阳,彭启慧,彭树松.超声造影增强强度在乳腺肿块诊断中的价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(2):107-110. 被引量:33
  • 2郑笑娟,蒋勇,彭敏霞,史晓龙,陈丽萍,洪惠峰,周国平.实时超声造影在乳腺肿块诊断中的价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2007,17(11):1185-1187. 被引量:8
  • 3Elverici E, Zengin B, Nurdan Barca A, et al. Interobserver andIntraobserver Agreement of Sonographic BIRADS Lexicon in theAssessment of Breast Masses[ J]. Iran J Radiol,2013,10(3) : 122-127.
  • 4Kim S M, Han H, Park } M, et al. A comparison of logisticregression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbservervariability [ J]. J Digit Imaging,2012,25(5) :599-606.
  • 5Aho M, Irshad A, Ackerman S al. Correlation of sonographicfeatures of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumorgrade, and hormone-receptor status [ J ]. J Clin Ultrasound ,2013,41(1):10-17.
  • 6Cho H C, Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, et al. Similarity evaluation inacontent-based image retrieval ( CBIR ) CADx system forcharacterization of breast masses on ultrasound images [ J ]. MedPhys,2011,38(4) :1820-1831.
  • 7Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Differentiatingbenignfrom malignant solid breast masses : Value of shear waveelastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscaleultrasound according to BI-RADS classification [ J ]. Br J Cancer,2012,107(2) :224-229.
  • 8Caproni N, Marchisio F, Pecchi A, et al. Contrast-enhancedultrasound in the characterization of breast masses : Utility ofquantitative analysis in comparison with MRI[ J]. Eur Radiol,2010,20(6):1384-1395.
  • 9ParkS,Koo J,Kim J H,et al. Clinicopathological characteristics ofmucinous carcinoma of the breast in Korea : Comparison with invasiveductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified [ J ]. J Korean Med Sci,2010,25(3) :361-368.
  • 10Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, et al. Subcategorization of ultra- sonographic BI-RADS category 4: Positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37 (5): 693-699.

引证文献13

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部