十二指肠营养管在胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术中应用的临床分析被引量：11

Clinical analysis of the application of duodenal feeding tube in thoracoscopy- and laparoscopy-guided esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

暂未订购

导出

摘要目的：探讨十二指肠营养管在胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术中应用的安全性及可行性。方法：总结分析重庆医科大学附属第一医院2011年3月至2012年9月73例食管癌患者在胸腹腔镜下行食管癌切除术术中放置十二指肠营养管的手术方法和临床资料。手术方法包括胸腔镜下游离食管、腹腔镜下游离胃、消化道重建等重要步骤。结果：73例患者术中均顺利放置十二指肠营养管，全组手术时间180～410 min，平均时间273 min，其中放置十二指肠营养管平均时间27 min。术中出血量50～450 mL，平均出血量120 mL。全组无死亡病例。术后发生吻合口瘘2例，胃肠功能不适5例，均顺利出院。结论：十二指肠营养管在胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术中应用安全、可行，值得推广应用。 Objective：This study was aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of applying duodenal feeding tube in thoracoscopy-and laparcoscopy-guided esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Methods：Clinical data of 73 esophageal carcinoma patients who underwent esophagectomy and received a duodenal feeding tube by thoracoscopy and laparoscopy from March 2011 to September 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Modes of operation included the separation of the esophagus by thoracoscopy, separation of the stomach by laparoscopy, reconstruction of the digestive tract, and so on. Results：A duodenal feeding tube was carefully placed at the site of esopha-gectomy of the patient. Operation time lasted from 180 min to 410 min, with an average of 273 min. The duodenal feeding tube was placed at 27 min into the operation. Intra-operative blood loss ranged from 50 mL to 450 mL, with an average of 120 mL. No post-operative death was encountered among the cases. After surgery, anastomotic fistula and gastrointestinal discomfort occurred in 2 and 5 of the 73 cases, respectively. Conclusion：Placement of a duodenal feeding tube at the site of esophagectomy through thoracoscopy and laparoscopy is completely safe and feasible.

作者黄旭杜铭陈焕文

机构地区重庆医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科重庆医科大学附属第一医院胸心外科

出处《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第19期1189-1191,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology

关键词胸腔镜腹腔镜食管肿瘤肠内营养 thoracoscopy laparoscopy esophageal carcinoma enteral nutrition

分类号 R473.73 [医药卫生—护理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, et al. Minimally invasive esophageetomy: a teaching hospital's first year experience[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2008, 21 (3) :220-225.
2Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, et al. Traditional invasive vs. min- imally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial)[J]. BMC Surg, 2011, 11(2):1-7.
3Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesopha- geal cancer: a muhicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9829):1887-1892.
4Sudarshan M, Ferri L. A critical review of minimally invasive esophagectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2012, 22 (4) :310-318.
5Cuesta MA, Biere SS, Henegouwen MI, et al. Randomised trial, Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy versus open oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2012, 4(5):462-464.
6Gupta V. Benefits versus risks: a prospective audit. Feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy[J]. WorldJ Surg, 2009, 33(7):1432-1438.
7Rino Y, Yukawa N, Murakami H, et al. Primary placement technique ofjejunostomy using the entristar^TM skin-level gastrostomy tube in patients with esophageal cancer[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2011, 11 (8): 1-6.
8Ghafouri A, Salehi OA, Keshavarz SA, et al. Evaluation of support- ing role of early enteraI feeding via tube jejunostomy following re- section of upper gastrointestinal tract[J]. Med J Islam Repub Irml, 2012, 26(1):7-11.
9Seike J, Tangoku A, Yuasa Y, et al. The effect of nutritional sup- port on the immune function in the acute postoperative period after esophageal cancer surgery: total parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition[J]. J Med Invest, 2011, 58 (1-2) :75-80.
10Takeuchi H, Ikeuchi S, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Clinical significance of perioperative immunonutrition for patients with esophageal cancer [J]. WorldJ Surg, 2007, 31(11):2160-2167.