期刊文献+

否定效应与逻辑等价——对沃森实验的解释 被引量:1

Negation Effect and Logical Equivalence——An Explanation to Wason's Selection Task
原文传递
导出
摘要 在沃森实验中,否定后件式的正确率显著低于肯定前件式的正确率,其主要原因是否定加工困难:在肯定语境中,否定难以激活,因此,肯定转化为否定困难;同时,否定意味着不确定性,对不确定性的恐惧是人类的普遍心理,这也大大增加了否定加工的难度。此外,实验中的重要概念"逻辑等价"涉及到深层理论问题,对这一概念的澄清,有助于我们更深刻地理解沃森实验。文章最后,基于对沃森实验的分析,讨论了逻辑与心理的关系。 In Wason's selection task, the main reason why the right rate of modus tollens is much lower than modes ponens is that negation processing is difficult. In the text of positive atmosphere, negation is difficult to be activated, so, transiting affirmation to negation is difficult. At the same time, negation means indetermination, which is difficult to be processed, too. So, fears to indetermination is universal among human beings. Besides, the term "logical equivalence " includes some deep level theoretical problems, which is favorable for us to understand Wason's selection task more deeply if it is clarified. At last, we discuss the relationship between logics and psychology based on the analysis of Wason' s selection task.
作者 刘剑凌
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期3-8,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 沃森实验 否定后件式 否定效应 逻辑等价 证实 心理学 Wason's selection task modus tollens modus ponens negation effect logical equivalence confirmation psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Wason, P. C. Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology[C].Harmondsworth:Penguin. 1966:145-146.
  • 2Oaksford,M.,& Chater, N.A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection [J]. Psychological Review, 1994 (101): 608-631.
  • 3Wason, P C.& Shapiro,D. Natural and Contrived Experience in a Reasoning Pronlems[J]. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,g 1071 (23): 63-71.
  • 4Griggs,R A.& Cox, J R.The Elusive Thematicmaterials Effect in Wason's Selection Task [J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1982(73): 407-420.
  • 5Margolis H. Wason's selection task with a reduced array[J]. Psycoloquy, 2000.
  • 6John R. Anderson.Cognitive Psychology and Its Implication (7th ed. )[M].Worth Publishers,2010:279.
  • 7费多益.认知视野中的情感依赖与理性、推理[J].中国社会科学,2012(8):31-47. 被引量:73
  • 8刘浩鑫,孟宪璋.情绪效价及强度对演绎推理的影响[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(5):635-638. 被引量:3
  • 9林珠梅,高华.材料情绪性对条件推理影响的眼动研究[J].心理学探新,2012,32(6):494-498. 被引量:6
  • 10M.A Just, P. A.Carpenter, T. A.Keller, et al.Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension[J],Science.1996 (274): 114-116.

二级参考文献106

  • 1郑希付.焦虑情绪与启动情绪两种状态下的记忆信息处理[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):351-355. 被引量:25
  • 2白学军,臧传丽,王丽红.推理与工作记忆[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):16-21. 被引量:22
  • 3E. Walker, Cognitive Science, 1978: Report of the State of the Art Committee to the Advisors of theAlfred P. Sloan Foundation, Unpublished, http://www, cbi. umn. edu/hostedpublications/pdf/Cognitive Science 1978 _ OCR.pdf, p. 75.
  • 4D. Norman, "What is Cognitive Science?" in D. Norman, ed., Perspectives on Cognitive Science, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1981, p. 1.
  • 5George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and lts Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 3.
  • 6Cf. John R. Searle, "Social Ontology, " Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Congress, London: King's College Publications, 2008.
  • 7B.R赫根汉.《心理学史导论》(上册),郭本禹等译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004年,第411页.
  • 8W.W.巴特利.《维特根斯坦传》,杜丽燕译,上海:东方出版中心,2000年,第116页.
  • 9Z. Pylyshyn, Information Science: Its Roots and Relations as Viewed from the Perspective of Cognitive Science, in F. Machlup and U. Mansfield, eds., The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, New York: Wiley, 1983, p. 76.
  • 10R, A. Griggs and J. R. Cox, "The Elusive Thematic-materials Effect in Wason's Selection Task," British Journal of Psychology, vol. 73, 1982, pp. 407-420.

共引文献177

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部