中国大学科技成果转化效率演变与影响因素——基于Bootstrap-DEA方法和面板Tobit模型的分析被引量：72

The Evolution and Impact Factors of University Technology Transfer Efficiency in China: Based on the Method of Bootstrap-DEA and Panel Tobit Model

原文传递

导出

摘要利用中国24所大学的相关数据,结合Bootstrap-DEA方法,对中国大学的科技成果转化效率进行评价和分析。并在此基础上利用面板Tobit模型检验了地区禀赋、金融发展程度、产业结构等因素对中国大学科技成果转化效率的影响。实证研究发现:2001和2002年,中国西部地区与东部地区的大学在科技成果转化效率上存在显著差异;而西部与中部地区的大学,以及东部与中部地区的大学在科技成果转化效率上并不存在显著差异。2008和2009年,中国西部地区、中部地区和东部地区的大学在科技成果转化效率上存在显著差异。地区禀赋、产业结构对于中国大学科技成果转化效率具有显著影响,但金融发展程度对其影响并不显著。 As a major component of the national innovation system, universities occupy pivotal positions in techno- logical innovation, development of high-tech industries and technology transfer. In this paper, combining with Boot- strap-DEA method, we use the relevant data of the 24 universities in China to evaluate and analyze the efficiency of university technology transfer. On this basis, we apply panel Tobit model to test the factors such as regional endowments, the degree of financial development, and industrial structure which affect the technology transfer. The empirical results show that, in 2001 and 2002, there are significant differences in technology transfer efficiency be- tween the western and the eastern regions, however, there is no significant difference between the west and cen- tral regions, also between the eastern and central regions. In 2008 and 2009, there are significant efficiency differ- ences among the three regions. Regional endowments and industrial structure has a significant impact on universi- ty technology transfer efficiency, whereas the impact of financial development is not significant.

作者何彬范硕

机构地区吉林大学中国国有经济研究中心吉林大学经济学院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期85-94,共10页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CJY053) 吉林大学中央高校基本业务费青年教师创新项目(450060327032) 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2011M500588) 吉林大学"985工程"项目

关键词大学科技成果转化效率 Bootstrap-DEA方法面板Tobit模型 university technology transfer efficiency Bootstrap-DEA method panel Tobit model

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济] G644 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Siegel D S, Waldman D, Link A N. Assessing the im- pact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study[J]. Research Policy, 2003,32(1):27-48.
2Chapple W, Lockett A, Siegel D S, et al. Assessing the relative performance of university technology trans- fer offices in the U.K.: Parametric and non-parametric evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2005,34(3):369-384.
3Bercovitz J, Feldman M. Academic entrepreneurs: So- cial learning and participation in university technology transfer[J]. Work in Progress, 2004.
4Feldman M I, Feller J B, Burton R. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research uni- versities[J]. Management Science, 2011,48(1):105-121.
5Lach S, Schankerman M. Royalty sharing and technolo- gy licensing in universities[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2004,2(2/3):252-264.
6Rothaermel J, Thursby M. Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages[J]. Research Policy, 2005,34(3):1076-1090.
7Jensen R, Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions[J]. American Eco- nomic Review, 2001,91(1):240-259.
8George G, Zahra S A, Wood D R. The effect of busi- ness-university alliances on innovative output and finan- cial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnol- ogy companies[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002, 17(2):577-609.
9Markman G, Phan P, Balkin D, et al. Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to Market[J]. Research Policy, 2005,34(7):1058-1075.
10Bercovitz J, Feldman M, Feller I, et al. Organization- al structure as determinants of academic patent and li- censing behavior: An exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001,26(1/2):21-35.