期刊文献+

L5/S1和骶髂关节对腰-髂固定稳定性影响的生物力学分析 被引量:5

Biomechanical analysis of L5/S1 complex and sacroiliac joints on the stability of lumbo-iliac fixation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨L5/S1和骶髂关节对腰-髂固定稳定性的影响,为腰-髂稳定性理想重建提供生物力学依据。方法:7具成年新鲜尸体L2-骨盆标本,先行L3~L5椎弓根螺钉固定,并将此结构定义为腰-髂部稳定初始状态。初始状态测试后,在同一标本上实施连续性操作如下:使用髂骨钉的L3-髂骨固定(A组)、L5/S1双侧关节突关节切除(B组)、L5/S1椎间盘切除(C组)、左侧骶髂关节切除(D组)。在MTS材料实验机上,给标本头侧分别施加600N轴向压缩和7Nm轴向扭转载荷,计算并比较各组结构压缩和扭转刚度。结果:初始状态组的压缩刚度值为(332±103)N/mm,A^D组腰-髂固定结构的压缩刚度分别为初始状态组的(122±15.5)%、(118.3±10.5)%、(81.1±7.7)%和(59.2±8.6)%。A和B组间无显著性差异(P>0.05),两组的压缩刚度均显著高于初始状态组(P<0.05);C组和D组的压缩刚度均显著低于A、B组及初始状态组(P<0.05),C组和D组间的差异也具有显著性(P<0.05)。初始状态组的扭转刚度值为(2.47±0.88)Nm/deg,A^D组固定结构的扭转刚度分别为初始状态组的(128±14.3)%、(120±12.6)%、(78.4±13.2)%和(62.9±11.3)%,A组和B组获得同等的扭转刚度(P>0.05),而且此两组的扭转刚度均显著高于初始状态、C组和D组(P<0.05),C、D组和初始状态三组彼此间的差异均具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:L5/S1椎间盘切除和单侧骶髂关节切除均显著降低腰-髂固定结构的稳定性,在腰-髂稳定性重建中,获得脊柱前方支撑和恢复骨盆环完整性是提高腰-髂固定结构稳定性的关键。 Objectives: To explore the biomechanical effects of L5/S1 complex and sacroiliac joints on the stability of lumbo-iliae fixation construct, and to provide evidences for the rational reconstruction. Methods: Seven fresh L2-pelvic specimens harvested from donated adult cadavers were used in this study. After testing the initial state simulated by L3-L5 pedicle screw fixation, L3-iliae fixation and sequential joint resections were performed on the same specimen as follows: group A, L3-iliac fixation using bilateral iliac screws; group B, bilateral L5/S1 facetectomy; group C, LS/S1 discectomy; group D, left side sacroiliac joint resection. Biome- ehanieal testing was performed on a material testing machine under 600N compression and 7Nm torsion loading modes for construct stiffness evaluation. Results: The compressive stiffness of initial state was (332+ 103)N/ram, group A-D obtained(122±15.5)%, (118.3±10.5)%, (81.1±7.7)% and (59.2±8.6)% of the initial com- pressive stiffness, respectively. No significant difference was detected between group A and B(P〉0.05); further- more, the two groups showed significantly higher compressive stiffness than the initial state(P〈0.05); group C and D exhibited lower compressive stiffness than group A, B and the initial state(P〈0.05); there was signifi- cant difference between group C and D(P〈0.05). The torsional stiffness of initial state was (2.47±0.88)Nm/deg. Group A-D acquired (128±14.3)%, (120±12.6)%, (78.4±13.2)% and (62.9±11.3)% of the initial torsional stiff ness, respectively. Group B obtained sufficient torsional stiffness compared to group A(P〉0.05); both group A and B exhibited notably higher torsional stiffness than all the other three groups (P〈0.05). Significant differ- ences were demonstrated among group C, D and initial state (P〈0.05). Conclusions: LS/S1 discectomy and one-side sacroiliac joint resection significantly decrease the stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct. There- fore, anterior support of spine and pelvic continuity reconstruction is important in the lumbo-iliac stability.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第9期837-841,共5页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:31170902)
关键词 腰骶部失稳 骶髂关节切除 髂骨钉固定 腰-髂固定 生物力学 Lumbo-sacral instability Sacroiliac joint resection Iliac screw fixation Lumbo-iliac fixation Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Moshirfar A, Rand FF, Sponseller PD, et al. Pelvic fixation in spine surgery: historical overview, indications, biomechani- cal relevance, and current techniques [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(Suppl 2): 89-106.
  • 2Tsuehiya K, Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, et al. Minimum 5-year analysis of L5-S1 fusion using sacropelvic fixation (bilateral S1 and iliac screws) for spinal deformity[J]. Spine, 2006, 31 (3): 303-308.
  • 3Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, et al. A prospective, non- randomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: peri- operative outcomes and complications[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(26 Suppl): 322-330.
  • 4Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S, et al. Outcome and compli- cations of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformi- ty: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation[J]. Spine, 2002, 27(7): 776-786.
  • 5Mindea SA, Salehi SA, Ganju A, et al. Lumbosacropelvic junction reconstruction resulting in early ambulation for pa- tients with lumbosacral neoplasms or osteomyelitis[J]. Neuro- surg Focus, 2003, 15(2): E6.
  • 6Doita M, Harada T, Iguchi T, et al. Total sacreetomy and reconstruction for sacral tumors [J]. Spine, 2003, 28 (15): E296-E301.
  • 7Hugate RJ, Dickey ID, Phimolsamti R, et al. Mechanical effects of partial sacrectomy: when is reconstruction necessary [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 450: 82-88.
  • 8Yu BS, Zheng ZM, Zhuang XM, et al. Biomechanical effects of transverse partial sacrectomy on the sacroiliac joints: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation of the borderline of sacroiliac joint instability[J]. Spine, 2009, 34(13): 1370-1375.
  • 9Yu BS, Zhuang XM, Li ZM, et al. Biomechanical effects of the extent of sacrectomy on the stability of lumbo-iliae re- construction using iliac screw techniques: what level of sacrectomy requires the bilateral dual iliac screw technique[J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), 2010, 25(9): 867-872.
  • 10Zheng ZM, Yu BS, Chen H, et al. Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-iliac fixation constructs: an anatomical and biomechanical study[J]. Spine, 2009, 34(16): E565-E572.

二级参考文献14

  • 1郑召民,吕游,陈辉.脊柱-骨盆融合术的适应证与外科技术进展[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(8):568-570. 被引量:8
  • 2郑召民,陈辉,吕游.成人髂骨钉钉道的影像学研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(8):586-589. 被引量:33
  • 3Moshirfar A, Rand FF, Sponseller PD. Pelvic fixation in spine surgery. Historical overview, indications, biomechanical relevance, and current techniques. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2005, 87(Suppl): 89-106.
  • 4Schwend RM, Sluyters R, Najdzionek J. The pylon concept of pelvic anchorage for spinal instrumentation in the human cadaver. Spine, 2003, 28: 542-547.
  • 5Mindea SA, Salehi SA, Ganju A, et al. Lumbosacropelvic junction reconstruction resulting in early ambulation for patients with lumbosacral neoplasms or ostcomyelitis. Neurosurg Focus, 2003, 15: E6.
  • 6Akesen B, Wu C, Mehbod AA, et al. Revision of loosened iliae screws: a biomeehanieal study of longer and bigger screws. Spine, 2008, 33: 1423-1428.
  • 7Zheng ZM, Yu BS, Chen H, et al. Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-lliae fixatiun eonstruets: An anatomical and biomechanieal study. Spine, 2009,34:E565-572.
  • 8Acharya NK, Bijukachhe B, Kumar R J, et al. llio-lumbar fixation-the Amrita technique. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21: 493-499.
  • 9Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Nakamura T. Palliative dual iliac screw fixation for lumbosacral metastasis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7: 99-102.
  • 10Yu BS, Zheng ZM, Zhuang XM, et al. Biomechanical effects of transverse partial sacrectomy on the sacroiliac joints: an in vitro human cadaverie investigation of the borderline of sacroiliac joint instability. Spine, 2009, 34: 1370-1375.

共引文献3

同被引文献80

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部