摘要
财产犯罪中的"非法占有目的"是故意内容之外不成文的主观构成要件要素。"非法占有目的"必要说之所以遭致批判,主要是因为在其内容的理解上存在问题。因为必要说一方面将"利用意思"作为其内容之一,一方面又在很大程度上淡化了"利用意思"的本来涵义。由于"利用意思"要素的存在,使得"非法占有目的"在取得罪与毁弃罪、盗窃罪与盗用行为的区分问题上出现了逻辑悖论。将"非法占有目的"的内容限定为永久性地占有他人财物的"排除意思"具有妥当性,辅以"建立占有"的存在与否,"非法占有目的"不仅可以在区分盗窃罪与盗用行为、取得罪和毁弃罪的问题上发挥作用,还能在权利行使问题的解决上有所作为。
＂ The purpose of illegal possession＂ is an unwritten subjective constituent of property crimes. Criticism to the theory about this constituent exists mainly because there exists deviation on understanding the connotation of ＂the purpose of illegal possession＂. On the one hand, ＂the purpose of utilization＂ is considered as a key part of ＂the purpose of illegal＂ possession＂, but on the other hand, scholars distort the original intention of ＂the purpose of utilization＂. The recognition Of this purpose will incur errors in logic, and the errors will be easily noticeable when we try to distinguish larceny from dam- age to property, as well as larceny from the use of other＇ s property without the purpose that removing owner＇ s possession permanently. To solve this problem, we should qualify the connotation of the concept ＂the purpose of illegal possession＂ to ＂the purpose that removing owner＇s possession permanently＂. Besides, this qualification can also play a positive role in dealing with the problem which exists in the execution of rights.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期88-94,共7页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
财产犯罪
非法占有目的
排除意思
利用意思
区分机能
property crime
the purpose of illegal possession
the purpose that removing owner’s possession permanently
the purpose of utilization
function to distinguish
