期刊文献+

1981-2010年我国高等院校校名变动探析 被引量:11

Analysis on the Change of Universities and Colleges’ Name in China (1981-2010)
原文传递
导出
摘要 1981-2010年我国高等院校校名变动呈现出以下几个特点:校名存活率低、稳定性差;不同层次高校校名变动幅度差别较大,"985工程"高校校名稳定性最高,"211工程"高校也保持着较大的稳定性,一般院校校名变动最大;校名不断变"大"、变"热"、变"宽"。30年来我国高校校名变动幅度大、涉及院校多,主要源于政府力量推动与高校自身的诉求。从校名变动的结果来看,有助于彰显办学实力,提升学校社会形象,开拓发展空间,获取更多办学资源,推动我国高校教育资源的优化组合,提高我国高等教育的质量与效益。但同时,也出现了校名的同质化、相似化、变动频繁化等问题,这给学校自身发展及公众的认知带来了诸多负面影响。 Colleges and universities' name change showed from 1981 to 2010 in china the following characteristics: their names survival rate were low, poor stability; the survival rate of different level of colleges and universities were different, "985"universities names' survival were highest, "211" universities names also maintained stable relatively, general colleges names' changed sharply. Changed trend was shown by their names "small" become "big", from "cold" to "hot", from "narrow" change "wide". Their names changed greatly, mainly from the administrative intervention and the University's own appeal. As a result, whose names change was beneficial to enhance school's strength, enhance school social image, promote developed room, achieve more education resource, promote the optimization of higher education resources in our country, improve schools' quality and benefit, which also led to schools names homogenization, similarity, change frequently, which has brought many negative effects to the development of school itself and the public perception.
作者 张学见
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第8期26-32,共7页 China Higher Education Research
关键词 高等院校 校名 “211工程” “985工程” 一般院校 college and university school's name 211 project 985 project ordinary colleges and universities
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献14

  • 1于思湘.中国高校校名语义结构特征探析[J].语言文字应用,2002(4):15-18. 被引量:16
  • 2广东省地图出版社.中国高校分布与概况[Z].广州:广东省地图出版社,2001..
  • 3Morphew, C.“A Rose by Any Other Name”: Which Colleges Became Universities. The Review of Higher Education. 2002, 25(2): 207.
  • 4Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure:Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations. In H. D. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the Human Services. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 1981.151-178.
  • 5Paul J. DiMaggio; Walter W. Powell,The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review. 1983, 48(2) : 147-160.
  • 6Lively, K. Why Colleges Want to be Called Universities. Chronicle of Higher Education. 1997-06-13, A33.
  • 7Aldersley, S. F.“Upward drift” Is Alive and Well: Research/ Doctoral Model Still Attractive to Institutions. Change. 1995, 27(5 ):50-56.
  • 8Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.45.
  • 9Kraatz, M.S. & Zajac, EJ. Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change. American Sociological Review. 1996,61(5):812-836.
  • 10Tolbert, P. Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1985 (30):1-13.

共引文献24

同被引文献92

引证文献11

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部