摘要
可持续发展是人类社会发展的必由之路。可持续发展指标的筛选和指标体系的构建,是人类全面实施可持续发展战略的重要组成部分,是人类社会可持续发展研究中的前沿性课题。20世纪90年代以来可持续发展研究的热点已经从可持续发展的定义转向可持续发展的评价,特别是指标体系的构建。20多年来,可持续发展指标体系的研究已经出现了从理论探讨走向了实际应用的趋势。通过分析20世纪90年代以来国内外有代表性的不同尺度上的可持续发展指标体系:联合国可持续发展委员会(UNCSD)的可持续发展指标体系、世界银行衡量可持续发展的新指标体系、波罗的海21世纪议程、英国、瑞典、芬兰、德国、美国、瑞士、丹麦及中国等国的可持续发展指标体系、欧洲城市可持续发展指标体系、新西兰玛努卡市的可持续发展指标体系、美国西雅图市社区可持续发展指标体系、中国的云南省、海南省、山东省等省以及南京市和哈尔滨市的可持续发展指标体系、山西交口县可持续发展指标体系、云南山区民族行政村可持续发展指标体系,对国内外可持续发展指标体系研究进行了总体评价。结果发现如果在以西方文明为主的现代化和城市化的框架下进行区域可持续发展的分析和评判,那得到的结论本质上是区域现代化或城市化程度的反映,而不是对区域可持续发展现状和趋势的评判。20多年来,国内外可持续发展指标体系的研究取得了丰硕的成果,为人类实施可持续发展战略打下了坚实的基础。
The sustainable development is the only way of human society development. Sustainable development indicator screening and indicator system construction is the forefront of scientific research in the study of human sustainable development. It is an important integrant in implementing the human sustainable development strategies. The study hotspot of human sustainable development turned from the definition of sustainable development to assessment of sustainable development, especially to indicator system construction since 1990s. There was a trend of theoretical exploration to practical application in the study of sustainable development indicator system in more than 20 years. By the analyses of typical sustainable development indicator systems for different levels both at home and abroad since 1990s, overall evaluation was given to the research of sustainable development indicator systems both at home and abroad. They are indicator system of the Committee of Sustainable Development（CSD）,UN, indicator system of the World Bank, Agenda 21 for the Baltic Sea Region, indicator system for sustainable development of United Kingdom, indicator system for sustainable development of Sweden, indicator system for sustainable development of Finland, German indicator system for sustainable development, America indicator system for sustainable development, Switzerland indicator system for sustainable development, Denmark indicator system for sustainable development, indicator system for sustainable development of China, urban indicator system for European sustainable development, indicator system for Manukau city in New Zealand, indicator system for community＇s sustainable development of Seattle city in America, indicator system for sustainable development of Ytuman Province, indicator system for sustainable development of Hainan Province, indicator system for sustainable development of Shandong Province, indicator system for sustainable development of Nanjing city, indicator system for sustainable development of Haerbing city, indicator system for sustainable development of Jiaokou county, and indicator system for sustainable development of the administrative villages of mountain nationalities of Yunnan. The results show that the conclusions will reflex regional modernization or urbanization, will not give regional assessment of sustainable development while regional assessment of sustainable development was done with the framework of modernization and urbanization under the western civilization. There were great achievements in the study of sustainable development indicator system both at home and abroad with a brilliant contribution made for the study of human sustainable development in more than 20 years, which constructed a solid basis of implementing the human sustainable development strategies.
出处
《生态环境学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第6期1085-1092,共8页
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(30760040)
云南省应用基础研究计划(2011FB089)
云南省重点建设学科和楚雄师范学院重点学科建设项目(05YJJSXK03)
云南省高校科技创新团队支持计划
云南省高校滇中民族植物学重点实验室(2011IRTSTYN)
楚雄师范学院院级学术骨干(2011<植物学>)
关键词
可持续发展
指标体系
研究进展
sustainable development
indicator system
research progress
