期刊文献+

唾液污染对牙本质粘结界面影响的微形态观察 被引量:2

SEM Micromorphology Study of Dentin-adhesive Bonding Interface after Salivary Contamination
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:研究唾液污染后牙本质表面不同处理方法对牙本质粘结界面的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察。方法:10颗人无龋第三恒磨牙垂直于牙体长轴切除冠部釉质,暴露牙本质中层,随机分为5组,每组2颗牙齿。其中A组无唾液污染,B组经唾液污染后无处理,其余3组经唾液污染分别进行完全吹干(C组)、水冲洗(D组)、水冲洗后再酸蚀15s(E组),37℃水浴24h后进行界面及表面SEM观察。结果:D、E组均获得较明显的树脂突及混合层,B、C组树脂突渗透较少,并且B组出现微裂隙。结论:在牙本质修复过程中,唾液污染后,通过水冲洗,水冲洗后再酸蚀15s,均可获得较好的粘结性能。 Objective: To observe dentin-adhesive bonding interface through different treatments after salivary contamination by scanning electron microscope(SEM).Methods: The enamel of occlusal surface of 10 third molars without caries extracted freshly was removed perpendicular to the long axis.The medial dentin was exposed to air.10 teeth were randomly divided into five groups,including the control group(A group:uncontaminated) and the other four groups(B group:salivary contamination,without treatment;C group:salivary contamination,completely dried;D group:salivary contamination,washed and E group:salivary contamination,washed,re-etching for 15s).Then,all specimens were placed into 37℃ distilled water.After 24 hours,the surface and interface of the samples were observed with SEM.Results: D,E groups obtain numerous resin tags and uniform hybrid layer,B,C group show less resin tags and microleakage is found in B group.Conclusion: The washed group and Re-ecthed groups are therefore suggested after salivary contamination.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2013年第7期627-629,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
基金 黑龙江省自然科学基金面上项目资助(编号:D200831) 哈尔滨市科技创新人才研究多项资金项目资助(编号:2007RFQS080)
关键词 牙本质粘结剂 唾液污染 扫描电子显微镜 Dentin adhesive Salivary contamination Scanning electron microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1房伯君,翟俊辉,杨亚囡.3种正畸粘接剂抗唾液污染的剪切强度比较[J].上海口腔医学,2003,12(6):453-455. 被引量:14
  • 2Xie J,Powers JM,McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength oftwo adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and con-taminated conditions [J],Dent Mater,1993,9(5):295-299.
  • 3el-Kalla IH,Garcia-Godoy F. Saliva contamination andbond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and den-tin [J].Am J Dent,1997,10(2):83-87.
  • 4Xie J,Power JM,McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength oftwo adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and con-taminated conditions [J].Dent Mater,1993,9(5):295-299.
  • 5Hegde MN,Hegde P,Shetty SK. The influence of salivarycontamination on the shear bond strength of two newer gen-eration dentin bonding agents-An in vitro study [J].J Con-serv Dent,2008,11(3):127-130.
  • 6Neelagiri K,Kundabala M,Shashi RA,et al. Effects of sali-va contamination and decontamination procedures on shearbond strength of self_ etch dentine bonding systems :An invitro study [J].J Conserv Dent,2010,13(2):71-5.
  • 7Hormati AA,Fuller JL,Denehy GE. Effects of contamina-tion and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etchedenamel [J].J Am Dent Assoc,1980,100(1):34-38.
  • 8周倩,李秋慧,梁媛,陈智.自酸蚀和酸蚀-冲洗粘结剂对Ⅰ类洞复合树脂充填的2年临床评价[J].口腔医学研究,2012,28(4):350-352. 被引量:9
  • 9Powers JM,O'keefe KL,Pinzon LM. Factors affecting invitro bond strength of bonding agents human dentin [J].Od-ontology,2003,91(1):1-6.
  • 10Park JW,LeeKC. The influence of salivary contaminationshear bond strength of dentin adhesive system [J].Oper-Dent,2004,29(4):437-442.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Ewoldsen E, Demke RS. A review of orthodontic cements and adhesives[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2001,120:45-48.
  • 2Douglas Rix, Foley TF, Mamandrass A. Comparision of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2001,119:36-42.
  • 3Grandhl RK,Combe EC, Speidel TM.Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop , 2001,119:251-255.
  • 4Hobson RS, Ledvinka J, Meechan JG. The effect of moiture and blood contamination on bond strength of a new orthodontic bonding material[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2001,120:54-57.
  • 5David VA, Staly RN, Bigelow HF, et al. Remnant amount and cleanup for 3 adhesives after debraketing [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2002, 121:291-296.
  • 6Larry J, Charles P, Craig F, et al. A comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets using various light sources, light guides, and cure times[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2002,121:510-515.
  • 7E.Asmussen,A.Peutzfeldt. Short-and long-term bonding efficacy of a self-etching,one-step adhesive[J].Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2003.41-45.
  • 8A.M.Gueders,J.F.Charpentier,A.I.Albert. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining[J].Operative Dentistry,2006,(4):450-455.doi:10.2341/05-55.
  • 9J.W.van Dijken,U.Pallesen. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class Ⅱ nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive[J].Journal of Dentistry,2011.16-25.
  • 10K.Koshiro,S.Inoue,H.Sano. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds produced by a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive[J].European Journal of Oral Sciences,2005.341-348.

共引文献21

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部