期刊文献+

氯化钆对脓毒症大鼠急性肺损伤的肺保护作用 被引量:5

The Lung Protective Role by Gadolinium Trichloride in Sepsis of the Rats Acute Lung Injury
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨氯化钆(GdCl3)在脓毒症大鼠急性肺损伤中的肺保护作用及可能机制。方法采用盲肠结扎穿孔术(CLP)建立脓毒症模型。将36只成年Wistar大鼠随即均分为假手术组(Sham组)、脓毒症组(CLP组)和氯化钆治疗组(GdCl3组),GdCl3组术后经尾静脉注射氯化钆溶液。检测血浆TNF-α、丙二醛(MDA)水平,用HE染色法观察肺组织形态,测定肺湿/干重比,统计方法采用SPSS19.0。结果 GdCl3组血浆TNF-α及MDA水平、肺湿/干重比均显著低于CLP组(P<0.05),光镜下可见GdCl3组肺组织病理学改变明显减轻。结论 GdCl3可明显减轻脓毒症所致的急性肺损伤的炎性反应。 Objective To explore the lung protective role and the possible mechanism by Gadolinium trichloride in sepsis acute lung injury in rats. Methods Model group by sepsis was established by cecal ligation and puncture(CLP).Thirty-six male Wistar rats were randomly divided into sham operation group(Sham group), sepsis group(CLP group) and Gadolinium trichloride group (GdC13 group), GdC13 group were injected gadolinium chloride solution via the tail after intravenous. HE staining optical microscope observation of structural changes in the lungs,wet/dry weight ratios and were measured. Statistical Methods were used SPSS19.0. Results GdCI3 group plasma TNF-α and MDA levels, lung wet / dry weight ratios were significantly lower than the CLP group (P〈0.05), the lung histopathological changes were significantly reduced of the GdCI3 group through optical microscope. Conclusion GdC13 can significantly reduce the inflammatory response of sepsis -induced acute lung injury
出处 《中国医药指南》 2013年第16期403-404,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
基金 山西省回国留学人员科研项目(编号:2011-105)
关键词 肺损伤 氯化钆 脓毒症动物模型 Lung injury Gadolinium trichloride Animal models of sepsis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Bellinger RP,Levy MM,Carlet JM,et al.Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septicshock:2008[J].Crit Care Med,2008,36(1):296-327.
  • 2Rivers EP,Ahrens T.Improving Outcomes for Severe Sepsisand Septic Shock:Tools for Early Identification of At-RiskPatients and Treatment Protocol Implementation[J].Critical CareClinics,2008,24(3 Suppl):S1-47.
  • 3韩璐,胡文全.脓毒症动物模型的研究进展[J].国际外科学杂志,2008,35(2):131-133. 被引量:1
  • 4高晓刚,陈德昌.动物模型在脓毒症研究中的意义[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(10):685-686. 被引量:6
  • 5Michael AM,Guy AZ,Charles E,et al.Future research directionsin acute lung injury:summary of a National Heart,Lung,andBlood Institute Working Group[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2003,167(7):1027-1035.
  • 6Matthay MA,Zimmerman GA,Esmon C,et al.Future ResearchDirections in Acute Lung Injury[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2003,107(4):1027-1035.
  • 7沈华浩,张根生.从炎症本质看急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(11):965-966. 被引量:26
  • 8Vuichard D,Ganter MT,Sehimmer RC,et a1.Hypoxia aggravateslipopolysaecharide-induced lung injury[J].Clin Exp Immunol,2005,141(2):248-260.
  • 9朱仁敏,张程,陈熙,张莹,徐德祥.Kupffer细胞在果糖引起的非酒精性脂肪肝中的作用[J].安徽医科大学学报,2012,47(3):257-261. 被引量:7
  • 10Strande JL,Routhu1 KV,Hsu A,et al.Gadolinium decreasesinflammation related to myocardial ischemia and reperfusioninjury[J].J Inflamm,2009,6(1):34.

二级参考文献63

  • 1任成山.脓毒症的发病机制[J].中国急救医学,2005,25(10):748-750. 被引量:36
  • 2庄颖,张雅萍.肠源性脓毒症的研究进展[J].国际外科学杂志,2007,34(6):403-406. 被引量:28
  • 3Angus Derek C. Epidemiology of sever sepsis in the United States : analysis of incidence,outcome,and associated costs of care [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 2001, 29(7) :1303-1310.
  • 4Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348(4) :1546-1554.
  • 5Corral J, Yelamos J, Hernandez-Espinosa D, et al. Role of lipopolysaceharideand cecal ligation arid puncture on blood coagulation and inflammation in sensitive and resistant mice models [J]. Am J Pathol, 2005, 166(4) : 1089-1098.
  • 6Remick DG, Bolgos G, Copeland S, et al. Role of interleukin-6 in mortality from and physiologic response to sepsis [J]. Infect Immun, 2005, 73(5) :2751-2757.
  • 7Zell Weger R, Wichmann MW, Ayala A, et al. Females in proestrus state maintain splenic immune functions and tolerate sepsis better than males[J]. Crit Care Med, 1997, 25(1) :106-110.
  • 8Remick DG, Newcomb DE, Bolgos GL, et al. Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis : lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation and puncture[J]. Shock, 2000, 13 (2) :110-116.
  • 9Cross AS, Opal SM, Sadoff JC, et al. Choice of bacteria in animal models of sepsis[J]. Infect Immun, 1993, 61 (7) :2741-2747.
  • 10Maier S. Cecal ligation and puncture versus colon ascendens stent peritonitis: two distinct animal models for polymicrobial sepsis [ J ]. Shock, 2004, 21(6) :505-511.

共引文献35

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部