期刊文献+

论欧洲法院的目的解释法

On the Teleological Interpretation of ECJ
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的解释法在欧洲法院的法解释方法体系中占据着核心地位。在适用与解释欧共体法的过程中,欧洲法院正是基于对欧共体法的创造性的目的解释,而成为推动欧洲一体化的发动机。目的解释法成为欧洲法院的核心法解释方法有多种原因。欧洲法院对目的解释法的采用有其自身特点,即强调立法的客观目的,强调欧共体法律秩序的整体立法目标,以及强调动态视角的目的解释。 Teleological interpretation is the key interpretive method of ECJ. Just with the creative teleo- logical interpretation, ECJ has become a locomotive {or European integration. There are many reasons for teleological interpretation to be the key interpretive method of ECJ. The teleological interpretation op- plied by ECJ has three characteristics,i, e. ,emphasis on the objective purpose of legislation,emphasis on the purposes of holistic legislation,and emphasis on dynamic interpretation.
作者 向在胜
出处 《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2013年第3期54-58,共5页 Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 2010年度教育部人文社会科学基金项目"欧盟国际民事诉讼法判例研究"(10YJC820122)
关键词 欧洲法院 欧共体法 目的解释法 the European Court of Justice EC Law Teleological Interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1许耀明.欧体法院之规范角色与其法律解释方法:一个法学方法论上的考察[M]//许耀明.欧盟法、WTO法与科技法.台北:元照出版公司,2009:27.
  • 2罗文波,魏虹.欧洲法院及其对欧共体法律的解释[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000(5):64-69. 被引量:2
  • 3Giulio Itzcovich. The Interpretation of Community Law by the European Court of Justice[-J]. German Law Jour nal, 2009, (10) .. 543 - 544.
  • 4Ian McLeod. Literal and Purposive Techniques of Legis- lative Interpretation: Some European Community and English Common Law Perspectives[J]. Brooklin Journal of International Law, 2003 2004,(29):1125.
  • 5Claus Gulmann. Methods of Interpretation of the Euro pean Court of Justice[J]. Scandinavian Study of Law, 1980, (24) .. 194 - 199.
  • 6Nial Fennelly. Legal Interpretation at the European Court of Justice[J]. Fordham International Law Jour- nal, 1996- 1997, (20) .. 667 - 668.
  • 7Gerard Conway. Historical Interpretation of Constitu- tions- the EU and US Comparedr EB/()L. E2013- 01 251, http://www, qub. ac. uk/sites/QUEST/ FileStore/Issue6/Filetoupload, 146243, en. pdf.
  • 8VIiguel Poiares Maduro. Interpreting European Law: Judicial 5djudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism[J]. Eu- :opean Journal of Legal Studies, 2007, (1) : 8- 12.
  • 9Niels Baeten. Judging the European Court o{ Justice: the Jurisprudence of Aharon Barak through a European Lens[J]. Columbia Journal of European Law, 2011- 2012,(18) :137.
  • 10Jannet A. Pontier Edwige Burg. EU Principles on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters:accord- ing to the Case Law of the European Court of Justice [M]. HagueT. M. C. Asser Press,2004:8- 12.

二级参考文献8

  • 1苏力.解释的难题:对几种法律文本解释方法的追问[J].中国社会科学,1997(4):11-32. 被引量:304
  • 2Damian Chalmers. Judicial Preferences and the Community Legal Order[J]. The Modern Law Review, No. 2 1997. 164-200.
  • 3Nigel Foster·Blackstone's EC LEGISLATION. 5th Edition[Z]. London: Blackstone Press Limited, 1990.72.
  • 4T. C. Hartley·The Foundations of European Community Law[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.53.
  • 5Barry E. Carter & Phillip R. Trimple·International Law. Second ed. [M]. Little, Brown and Company, 1995. 339.
  • 6Stephen Weatherill. Cases & Materials on EEC Law [Z]. London: Blackstone Press Limited, 1992.
  • 7弗兰西斯·斯奈德著,宋英编译.欧盟法律概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,39.
  • 8P. E. Morris and others. EC Law and Professional Football: Bosman and its Implications[J]. The Modern Law Review. No. 6,1996. 893-903.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部