领导与下属的调节焦点对下属工作绩效的影响作用被引量：14

The Influence of Regulatory Focus of Supervisors and Subordinates on the Performance of the Subordinates

导出

摘要调节焦点理论认为个体具有两种不同的调节焦点:促进性调节焦点和防御性调节焦点。探讨领导与下属的调节焦点对下属的任务绩效和情境绩效的影响作用,采用领导与下属配对样本进行调研,样本包括249对领导和下属。研究结果表明:(1)下属的促进性调节焦点对其情境绩效中的人际促进和工作奉献两个维度均具有显著影响作用,下属的防御性调节焦点对其任务绩效具有显著影响作用;(2)领导者的促进性调节焦点对下属情境绩效中的人际促进维度具有显著影响作用,领导者的防御性调节焦点对下属任务绩效具有显著影响作用;(3)领导者与下属之间在促进性调节焦点上的匹配通过领导—下属交换的中介作用影响下属的情境绩效。 Regulatory focus theory proposes that people have two distinct self-regulatory foci, promotion focus and prevention focus. The major purpose of this study was to examine the effect of regulatory focus of supervisors and subordinates on the task performance and contextual performance of the subordinates. Participants of this study included 249 employees and their supervisors, and data were matched in pairs for statistics. Some of the key findings included：（1） Promotion focus of the subordinates was positively related to the contextual performance of them, and prevention focus of the subordinates was positively related to the task performance of them; （2） Promotion focus of the supervisors was positively related to the interpersonal facilitation dimension of contextual performance of the subordinates, and prevention focus of the supervisors was positively related to the task performance of the subordinates; （3） The fit of promotion regulatory focus of the supervisors and the subordinates was positively related to the performance of the subordinates with leader-member exchange（LMX） as the mediator.

作者吴志明武欣武艳茹李蕊

机构地区清华大学经济管理学院北京航空航天大学经济管理学院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期173-180,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金国家自然科学基金项目"复杂变化环境下企业组织管理整体系统及其学习变革研究"(71121001) 国家自然科学基金青年项目"基于直线经理参与度的人力资源管理有效性研究"(70802005)

关键词调节焦点促进性调节焦点防御性调节焦点调节焦点匹配 regulatory focus promotion focus prevention focus regulatory focus fit

分类号 F272.92 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献24

1Higgins E T. Beyond pleasure and pain[J]. AmericanPsychologist, 1997(52):1280-1300.
2Gorman C A, Meriac J P, Overstreet B L,et al. A me-ta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological net-work: Work-related antecedents and consequences [J].Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012(80):160-172.
3Higgins E T. Making a good decision: Value fromfit[J]. American Psychologist, 2000(55): 1217-1230.
4Higgins E T, Friedman R S,Harlow R E,et al.Achievement orientations from subjective histories ofsuccess: Promotion pride versus prevention pride [J]. Eu-ropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2001(31):3-23.
5Motowidlo S J, Van Scotter J R. Evidence that taskperformance should be distinguish from contextual per-formance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1994(79):475-480.
6Van Scotter J R, Motowidlo S J. Interpersonal facilita-tion and job dedication as separate facets of contextualperformance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,81(5):525-531.
7Brockner J, Higgins E T. Regulatory focus theory: Im-plications for the study of emotions at work[J]. Organi-zational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 2001,86(1):35-66.
8Lam T W, Chiu C. The motivational function of regula-tory focus in creativity [J]. Journal of Creative Behav-ior, 2002,36(2):138-150.
9Wu C,McMullen J S, Neubert M J, et al. The influ-ence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativi-ty[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2008(23):587-602.
10Kristof A L. Person-organization fit: An integrative re-view of its conceptualizations, measurement, and impli-cations[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996(49):1-49.

二级参考文献47

1陈学军,王重鸣.绩效模型的最新研究进展[J].心理科学,2001,24(6):737-738. 被引量：21
2Borman, W. C and Motowidlo, S. J. Expanding the CriterionDomain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance[C]. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eels),Personnel Se-lection in Organizations (pp. 71 - 98 ). San Francisco:Jossey- Bass. 1993.
3Coleman, V. I, and Borman, W. C. Investigating the under-lying structure of the citizenship performance domain [J ].Human Resource Management Review, 2000,10:25 - 44.
4Rotundo, M. and Sackett. P. R. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance toglobal ratings of job performance [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002,87: 66 - 80.
5Arvey, R. D. & Murphy, K. R. Performance evaluation in work setting [ J ]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998,49:141 - 168.
6Conway, J. M. Distinguish contextual performance from task performance for mangagerial jobs [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84 : 3 - 13.
7Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. The Social psychology of organizations (2nd Ed. )[M]. New York:Wiley. 1978.
8Motowidlo, S. J., and Van Scotter,J. R. Evidence that task performance should be distinguish from contextual performance [J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994,79: 475 -480.
9Van Scotter, J. R., and Motowidlo, S. J. Interpersonal Facilitation and Job Dedication as Sepearate Facets of Contextual Peformance [J ]. Jouranl of Applied Psychology, 1996,81 : 525 - 531.
10Kiker, D. S. and Motowidlo, S. J. Main and interaction effects of task and performance on supervisory reward decisions [ J ]. Journal Applied Psychology, 1999, 84 : 602 -609.