文化价值取向与自我调节点对反馈效果的调节作用被引量：12

THE CULTURAL VALUE AND SELF-REGULATORY SYSTEM ON FEEDBACK EFFECTS

下载PDF

导出

摘要选择个体主义、集体主义文化价值取向和自我调节点作为影响反馈效果的调节变量,采用2×2(反馈方式、反馈对象)两因素组间实验设计,以公文处理练习为实验材料,对171名MBA学生进行反馈的干预实验研究。结果表明,集体主义倾向、自我调节点是影响反馈效果的调节变量,集体主义倾向强的人得到针对小组的反馈,公文处理成绩提高;表扬提升调节点的被试公文处理成绩反而降低。 Considering the cultural value and self-regulatory system as the mechanism of feedback effects. The study a-dopted 2×2(type of feedback and target of feedback)two factors between subjects design, in-basket task as the experimental material. 171 MBA students were selected to participate in the feedback intervention study. The results showed that the cultural value and the self-regulatory system moderated the effects of feedback. For collectivism, they increased their performance if they got group feedback. Negative feedback under prevention focus increased performance, but positive feedback under promotion focus decreased performance.

作者王永丽时勘

机构地区中国科学院心理研究所

出处《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第6期738-743,共6页 Acta Psychologica Sinica

基金国家自然科学基金项目(70072031)。

关键词反馈方式反馈对象文化价值取向自我调节点防御调节点提升调节点 type of feedback, target of feedback, cultural value, self-regulatory system, prevention focus, promotion focus.

分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Alvero A M, Bucklin B R, Austion J. An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985 ～ 1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2001, 21: 3～29
2Ilgen D R, Fisher C D, Taylor M S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 64(4): 349～374
3Balcazar F, Hopkins B L, Suarez Y A. critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 1985, 7:65～89
4Podsakoff P M, Farch J F, Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance: A preliminary test of some control theory propositions. Academy of management Proceedings, 1986. 198～202
5Nease A A, Mudgett B O, Quifiones M A, Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84(5): 806～814
6Waldersee R, Luthans F. The impact of positive and corrective feedback on customer service performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1994, 15:83～95
7Podsakoff P M, Farch J F. Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989, 44: 45～67
8Vance R J, Colella A. Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goal. Journal of Applied Psychology,1990, 75:68～76
9Higgins E T. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 1997, 52:1280～1300
10Higgins E T. Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Pchologist, 2000, 13:141～154

二级参考文献9

1Earley P C. An examination of the Mechanisms Underlying the Relation of Feedback to Performance Academy of Management of Proceedings 1986:214～218
2Ilgen D R, Fisher C D, Taylor M S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979, 164: 349～371
3Nease A A, Musgett B O, Quinones M A. Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptanceof performance feedback.. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999,84,5: 806～814
4Earley P C, Stubblebine P. Intercultural assessment of performance feedback. Group and Organization Studies 1989, 14: 161～181
5Earley P C. Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39: 89～117
6Barr S H, Conlon E J. Effects Of Distribution of Feedback in Work Groups Academy of management Journal 1994, 37(3): 641～655
7Singelis T M, Triandis H C, Bhawuk D, Gelfand M J. Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross -cultural Research, 1995, 29: 240～275
8Triandis. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder ,CO,Westview, 1995
9Hofstede. Hofstede's cultural dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's values survey. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 1984,15: 417～433