波特假说的滞后性和最优环境规制强度分析——基于系统GMM及门槛效果的检验被引量：65

The Hysteresis of Porter Hypothesis and the Optimal Intensity of Regulation——Inspection based on System GMM and the Threshold Effect

下载PDF

导出

摘要 "波特假说"认为合理设置的环境规制政策在长期能够刺激企业进行技术创新,产生创新补偿效应,从而弥补因规制增加的成本,因此发挥规制的创新效应是实现经济发展与环境保护双赢的关键。文章运用2000～2010年中国29个地区的面板数据,通过系统GMM和门槛回归方法,在低碳视角下检验"波特假说"是否存在及存在的条件并确定最优规制水平。结果表明环境规制对创新的激励作用具有一定的滞后性,在当期阻碍技术创新,在滞后期促进创新且在滞后二期促进作用最明显;环境规制强度与技术创新之间存在三重门槛效应,规制强度较低时规制对创新的影响表现为一种潜动力,不足以引发创新活动的开展,在最优规制水平显著促进创新,强度过高时促进作用减弱。 The“porter hypothesis”states that reasonable set of environmental regulation can stimulate enterprise technical innovation in the long term and produce innovation compensation effects, which can compensate for cost of obeying the regula- tion. So realizing the innovation effects of regulation is the key to realize economic development and environmental protection. This paper examines the impact of environmental regulation on enterprises＇ technological innovation in low-carbon perspective using the dynamic panel data for 29 regions in China from 2000 to 2010. In addition, we verify the existence of the “Porter Hypothesis” and the optimal level of regulation. The results show that innovation incentives of environmental regulation have a certain lag period. In the current, they hinder technological innovation, but promote innovation in the lag period, the effects are the most obvious in the lagging period; technological innovation effects of environmental regulations also show differences in the different strength of the regulations, in the lower intensity regulation, impacts on innovation performance of regulation stay as a potential power, which do not strong enough to lead innovative. Regulation will promote innovation in the optimal level of regulation significantly, promotion is weakened when intensity is too high.

作者李平慕绣如

机构地区山东理工大学商学院

出处《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期21-29,共9页 Industrial Economics Research

基金山东省自然科学基金"研发贡献度的动态规律及影响因素的内生门限检验"(项目编号:2009ZRB02140) 国家软科学研究计划项目"金融危机下自主创新与经济结构调整研究--基于有效需求视角的分析"(项目编号:2010GXS5D226)

关键词低碳视角环境规制技术创新波特假说门槛效应 low-carbon perspective environmental regulation technological innovation Porter hypothesis threshold effect

分类号 F062.9 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Porter, M. E. ,1991, “America’s Green Strategy”,Scientific American,264(4) :96.
2Ambec,S.,and Barla, P.,2002,“A Theoretical Foundation of the Porter Hypothesis”,Economics Letters,15(3) :355 -360.
3Magat, W. A.,1978,“ Pollution Control and Technological Advance : A Dynamics Model of the Firm ”,Journal of Envi-ronmental Economics and Management ,5(1) :1-25.
4Bailey,J. A, 1974, “Brush Control on Sandy Rangelands in Central Alberta”,Jounal of Range Management, 32 :65-68.
5Wanlley, Whitehead, 1994, “The Contribution of Environmental Regulations to Slowdown in Productivity Growth”,Jour-nal of Environmental Management ,8(4) :381-390.
6Popp,D., Newell R. G.,Jaife A. B. ,2009, Energy, the Environment and Technological Change, National Bureau ofEconomic Research Working Paper No. 14832.
7Ambec, S.,Cohen M.,Elgie,S. , et al,2011,“The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance in-novation and competitiveness.,,, Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, 11~01.
8郭建万,陶锋.集聚经济、环境规制与外商直接投资区位选择——基于新经济地理学视角的分析[J].产业经济研究,2009(4):29-37. 被引量：59
9Ederington,J. ,2001,“International Coordination of Trade and Domestic Policies”,The American Economic Review(5):1580-1593.
10Levinson,A. ,1996, KEnvironmental regulations and manufacturers,location choices: Evidence from the Census of Man-ufactures”,Journal of Public Economics ^62( 1) :5~29.