期刊文献+

基于FSDT的新老驾驶人危险感知差异性致因研究 被引量:8

Causal Mechanism of Difference between Experienced and Novice Drivers in Hazard Perception Based on Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了降低新驾驶人的事故发生率,基于模糊信号检测理论,通过模拟仿真实验手段,设计并进行了危险感知实验和危险分级实验,在此基础上,分析了新老驾驶人危险感知差异性的原因.研究结果表明:新老驾驶人危险感知差异性是由于反应偏好不同所致,具有宽大偏好反应的驾驶人反应时距小,反应也更快,反之亦然;经过危险感知训练的新驾驶人反应偏好与反应时距之间的相关系数为0.81,未经危险感知训练新驾驶人的相关系数为0.63,经验丰富老驾驶人的相关系数为0.75;在对新驾驶人的训练中,应注重降低新驾驶人的危险阈值. test was d In order to reduce the rate of accidents of novice drivers, a hazard perception and rating esigned using a driving simulator by the fuzzy signal detection theory. Through the test, causes of difference between experienced and novice drivers in hazard perception performance were analyzed. The results show that the difference between the experienced and novice drivers in hazard perception results from the difference of response bias, such that more liberal responses are associated with faster latencies and more conservative responses lead to slower latencies. The correlation coefficient between response bias and latency is 0.81 for the trained novice drivers, 0.63 for the untrained novice drivers, and 0.75 for the experienced drivers. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the hazard threshold of the novice driver through training.
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期532-538,共7页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51108390)
关键词 驾驶行为 危险感知能力 敏感度 反应偏好 模糊信号检测理论 driving behavior hazard perception ability sensitivity response bias fuzzy signaldetection theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1SAGBERG F, BJRNSKAU T. Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers[ J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2006, 38(2) : 407-414.
  • 2AVINOAM B, DAVID S, TAL 0 G. Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving[ J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(4): 1240-1249.
  • 3ROSENBLOObi T, SHAHAR A, ELHARAR A, et al. Risk perception of driving as a function of advanced training aimed at recognizing and handling risks in demanding driving situations [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008, 40(2) : 697-703.
  • 4CRUNDALL D E, UNDERWOOD G. Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers[ J]. Ergonomics, 1998, 41(4) : 448-458,.
  • 5CRUNDALL D E, CHAPMAN N P, UNDERWOOD G. Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving[ J]. Psychology Application, 2003, 9(3) : 163-174.
  • 6RUNDMO T, IVERSEN H. Risk perception and driving behavior among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(1) : 1-21.
  • 7BENDA V H, HOYOS C G. Estimating hazards in traffic situations [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1983, 15(1): 1-9.
  • 8WALLIS THOMAS S A, HORAWILL M S. Using fuzzysignal detection theory to determine why experienced and trained drivers respond faster than novices in a hazard perception test [ J ]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2007, 39(6) : 1177-1185.
  • 9WICKENS C D. Engineering psychology and human pedormance[M]. 2nd Ed. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc. , 1992 : 211-257.
  • 10PARASURAMAN R, MASALONIS A J, HANCOCK P A. Fuzzy signal detection theory basic postulates and formulas for analyzing human and machine performance[J]. Human Factors, 2000, 42(4) : 636- 659.

二级参考文献6

共引文献19

同被引文献82

  • 1路漫漫.眨眼与人的心理活动[J].心理世界,2000(6):36-36. 被引量:2
  • 2陈明伟,袁晓华,潘敏,谢汶莉.从道路交通事故统计分析对比谈预防措施[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(8):59-63. 被引量:57
  • 3李百川,殷国祥,苏如玉.汽车驾驶员反应特性与交通事故关系的分析研究[J].人类工效学,1995,1(2):26-31. 被引量:10
  • 4Crnndall D, Chapman P, Trawley S, et al. Some hazards are more attractive than others: Drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012, 45:600 -609.
  • 5Cheng A S, Ng T C, Lee H C. A comparison of the hazard perception ability of accident-involved and accident-free motor- cycle riders[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2011, 43 (4) : 1 464 - 1 471.
  • 6Horswill M S, Anstey K J, Hatherly C G, et al. The crash involvement of older drivers is associated with their hazard per- ception latencies[J]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2010, 16(5): 939 -944.
  • 7Pelz D C, Krupat E. Caution profile and driving record of undergraduate males[ J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1974, 6(1) : 45 - 58.
  • 8Mckenna F P, Horswill M S. Hazard perception and its relevance for driver licensing[J]. Journal of the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, 1999, 23(1): 26-41.
  • 9Deery H A. Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 1999,30(4) :225 -236.
  • 10Underwood G, Crundall D, Chapman P. Driving simulator validation with hazard perception[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011, 14(6): 435 -446.

引证文献8

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部